Introduction

Overview of research published in RIO so far

Engagement with RIO content

Viewing

Journal-level views

Traffic at the journal level over a given time period depends on a number of criteria, including the amount of its content, the degree to which the content matches interest in the group of potential readers during that timeframe, as well as findability and accessibility.

For RIO, journal-level traffic data has been in the order of just above 100,000 unique page views in 2020, at an average annual growth rate of about 20,000, for which 2021 is on track (cf. Fig. 1). This sums up to about 340,000 unique page views, in total, until now. Of these, about 100,000 (26%) are due to traditional publications from the final stage of the research cycle (Research Articles and Review Articles), while 74% of RIO’s traffic is due to articles about early and intermediate steps. RIO tracks views to the HTML, XML and PDF versions of its articles and distinguishes between unique views and total views, with the latter including repeat visits. The unique HTML, PDF and XML views represent about 58%, 37% and 5% of the unique views, respectively.

Figure 1.  

Aggregate annual traffic to RIO articles between 2015 and March 2021 by file format.

Article-level views

For each article, RIO records the number of first-time (unique) and repeat visits (as identified via cookies) to the RIO website, as well as total views (i.e. the sum of unique and repeat visits) and makes these data available via an article’s Metrics tab. A list of the ten articles with the highest number of unique views as of 30 March 2021 is given in Table 3. Repeat visits are a basic form of engagement with the content, so the total number of views per article is also indicated in Table 3, as well as the ratio between both numbers (Total versus Unique ratio, τ).

Table 3.

Download as

CSV

XLSX

Articles with the most unique views as of 30 March 2021, along with information about total views, the ratio between total and unique views (τ) and the article type.

Rank	Unique views	Total views	Ratio τ of Total views/ Unique views	Article	Article type
1	14684	23803	1.6	The influence of religion on science: the case of the idea of predestination in biospeleology (Romero Jr. 2016)	Research Article
2	10802	18250	1.7	A review of biodiversity-related issues and challenges in megadiverse Indonesia and other Southeast Asian countries (von Rintelen et al. 2017)	Review Article
3	10423	23624	2.3	Strategies and guidelines for scholarly publishing of biodiversity data (Penev et al. 2017)	Guidelines
4	9258	16128	1.7	Vertical-Horizontal Regulated Soilless Farming via Advanced Hydroponics for Domestic Food Production in Doha, Qatar (Abdullah 2016)	Methods
5	8997	17404	1.9	Support Your Data: A Research Data Management Guide for Researchers (Borghi et al. 2018)	Project Report
6	8565	14156	1.7	The value of statistical tools to detect data fabrication (Hartgerink et al. 2016)	Small Grant Proposal
7	8182	33908	4.1	DNAqua-Net: Developing new genetic tools for bioassessment and monitoring of aquatic ecosystems in Europe (Leese et al. 2016)	Grant Proposal
8	8149	14726	1.8	Language evolution to revolution: the leap from rich-vocabulary non-recursive communication system to recursive language 70,000 years ago was associated with acquisition of a novel component of imagination, called Prefrontal Synthesis, enabled by a mutation that slowed down the prefrontal cortex maturation simultaneously in two or more children – the Romulus and Remus hypothesis (Vyshedskiy 2019)	Research Article
9	8004	16473	2.1	Enabling Open Science: Wikidata for Research (Wiki4R) (Mietchen et al. 2015b)	H2020 Grant Proposal
10	7410	17985	2.4	Controlling the taxonomic variable: Taxonomic concept resolution for a southeastern United States herbarium portal (Franz et al. 2016)	NSF Grant Proposal

Inspecting the data in Table 3 from the perspective of the research stages defined for Table 1 gives rise to a number of observations. First, publication types representing the early (ranks 6, 7, 9 and, 10), late (1, 2 and 8) and intermediate stages (3, 4 and 5) of the research cycle as per Table 1 are all represented. Second, the three late-stage entries in this list of ten is more than would be expected, based on the 11% prevalence of late-stage publications in the overall RIO corpus, but very close to the 29% unique visits going to late-stage articles, as discussed along Fig. 1. Third, τ is highest for early-stage entries in the Table (2.6 altogether), lowest for late-stage entries (1.7) and intermediate for intermediate-stage entries (2.0), so a possible research question could be what the relationship is between different stages of the research cycle and measures of engagement (like τ) with outcomes from those stages. Two more data points on τ for intermediate outcomes: a Workshop Report (Cunha et al. 2020) currently has 21181 total views versus 1171 unique views, i.e. τ = 18 and a Policy Brief (Borsch et al. 2020) has 20229 total views versus 3013 unique views, i.e. a τ = 6.7.

Sub-article-level views

Beyond per-article views, RIO also tracks sub-article view stats, which are likewise made accessible via an article’s Metrics tab. Suppl. materials 3, 4, 5, 9

contain aggregate view stats for figures, subfigures, tables and supplementary materials across the current RIO corpus.

The most viewed figure - Figure 1 of Maumet and Nichols (2017) (a Project Report from a hackathon) - contains sample code. The second most viewed figure - Figure 1 of Bingham et al. (2017) - contains a “map of the global and European biodiversity informatics landscape” and the third one - from Maumet and Nichols (2017) again, this time their Fig. 2 - contains screenshots of example results. Figure views can also be expressed relative to article views: one in four viewers of Senapati et al. (2020) (a Research Idea) specifically viewed its Figure 1, which is a graphical summary.

Many articles in RIO and elsewhere contain plates that combine several original images into one composite figure. RIO provides authors with the possibility to keep the original images individually accessible, which facilitates reuse. As of 31 March 2021, 28 of 300 RIO articles had composite figures that were set up this way.

The top 12 most viewed subfigures are all from just two articles, Marek (2017) (a Methods article that has five figures in total, all composite, with a total of 17 sub-figures) and Vyshedskiy et al. (2017) (a Research Article that has 12 figures in total, of which five are composite, with a total of 12 sub-figures). The first subfigure not from these two - Fig. 6a of Egloff et al. (2017) - is interesting in that it, in turn, depicts a plate composed of 34 illustrations. The 20th-most viewed subfigure has 86% of the views of the most viewed subfigure. This distribution can be interpreted as suggesting that if there are subfigures, then readers tend to go through them more systematically than selectively. The ratio of article views versus subfigure views, which is between 10.5 and 27.3 for all of these 20 most downloaded subfigures, is consistent with this interpretation.

The most viewed table - Table 3 of Chodacki et al. (2017) (a Workshop Report) contains “Principles and recommendations for preprint technology development”. The second most viewed table is the collection of quotes listed in our opening editorial, and the third most viewed table is Table 1 of Koureas et al. (2016) (a Grant Proposal), summarizing the comments that the proposal received during peer review.

Supplementary files receive less attention than main-text ones: six main-text figures have more views than the most viewed supplementary file, an Excel spreadsheet from von Rintelen et al. (2017) containing “Biodiversity-related data and economic information for the 10 ASEAN member states”. Likewise, the top 20 most viewed main-text figures have more views than the second most viewed supplementary file, a Data Sharing Agreement from Egloff et al. (2016).

Citing

The act of citing a resource from a research publication is meant to indicate the flow of information, so as to allow others to trace it back when trying to build on something reported previously, to question or reframe it or otherwise engage with it. This has given rise to a whole industry of citation-based research evaluation that is hard to ignore in any research context, but much of what RIO publishes does not fit neatly into the current research evaluation landscape.

In this section, we focus instead on the original information flow aspects of citations and consider two kinds of flows - within a research cycle and across fields - and illustrate them with RIO examples.

Flow of information within a research cycle - even if it is slow as in the case of “sleeping beauties'' (Philipson 2016) - implies some form of continuity. An example is a Project Report (Peterson 2017) - resulting from the Neurohackweek 2016 - that followed up on a previously-published Methods paper (Madan 2016), which provides a guide to generating a print-ready 3D model of brain structures. On another occasion, a Data Management Plan (Neylon 2017) followed the successful Grant Proposal that was published the previous year (Neylon and Chan 2016). Similarly, a Research Presentation (Senderov et al. 2016) - part of a PhD project aiming to build an Open Biodiversity Knowledge Management System (OBKMS) - can be traced back to the PhD Project Plan (Senderov and Penev 2016).

Within scientific projects, the progress of the research process - and even workshops - can also be conveniently tracked through a series of Workshop Reports, as in the case of the European Biodiversity Observation Network (EU BON), whose series of four stakeholder events were timely communicated one by one in Wetzel et al. (2016), Vohland et al. (2016a), Vohland et al. (2016b) and Wetzel et al. (2017).

Research published in RIO has naturally been reused and built upon in other scholarly sources. For instance, an article investigating the role of religion in attitudes and responses to the climate crisis in Nigeria (Nche 2020) cites a Research Article from RIO about the influence of religion on science (Romero Jr. 2016).

Interim and early outputs available from RIO have also served as stepping stones in unrelated studies published elsewhere. A paper outlining a framework for a reference database for images of marine taxa (Howell et al. 2019) noted that manual processing of images “forms the current bottleneck in image-based ecological sampling”, citing a RIO report (Schoening et al. 2017) on a workshop that had explored avenues for automation. A 2020 Report by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) (Joint Research Centre 2020) addressed the discoveries made possible with the help of citizen science over a period of 5 years and referenced a Workshop Report about “defining principles for mobile apps and platforms development in citizen science” (Sturm et al. 2018), as well as a RIO commentary (Schade et al. 2019) on the potential of combining low-cost air quality sensors with citizen science.

Besides continuity, RIO is interested in cross-fertilization between different parts of the research ecosystem. A RIO Research Article laying out a hypothesis about the neural basis of imagination (Vyshedskiy 2019) has been discussed from perspectives as diverse as connectomics (Changeux et al. 2021), marketing (Tanaka 2020) and linguistic philosophy (Lobo 2021). A Research Idea about a knowledge graph for biodiversity research (Page 2016) has helped inspire work on a similar knowledge graph for hydrogen research (Lin et al. 2020). Last but not least, the RIO article DNAqua-Net: Developing new genetic tools for bioassessment and monitoring of aquatic ecosystems in Europe (Leese et al. 2016) is likely one of the most cited Grant Proposals, with about 100 citations to date from various fields, including invasion biology (Rusch et al. 2020) and marine biotechnology (Rotter et al. 2021).

When aggregating data at the journal level, other perspectives on citations emerge. For instance, Fig. 2 illustrates that a non-RIO article on the Darwin Core standard for biodiversity data (Wieczorek et al. 2012) is cited from multiple RIO articles, for example, an NSF Grant Proposal (Franz et al. 2016), a Research Idea (Page 2016), a Project Report (Smirnova et al. 2016), a Policy Brief (Runnel et al. 2016), a Guidelines article (Penev et al. 2017) and a Forum Paper (Egloff et al. 2017).

Figure 2.  

Partial citation graph around the Darwin Core paper (Wieczorek et al. 2012), filtered for citations involving RIO papers. From Wikidata.

RIO as a knowledge hub emphasizing teams, projects, communities, curation and collaboration

Changes in RIO workflows

Taking into account our experience with RIO over the last five years and the insights and trends outlined above, we have made a number of changes to the way RIO operates. This section discusses the two main ones, which concern the scope of collections and the organization of peer review and briefly looks into a third - article types.

Collection management

With the evolving range of uses of RIO materials in mind, permanent article collections in RIO have recently been upgraded such that they can not only show content published in RIO, but also metadata of materials published elsewhere, all in a consistent design that can be configured by the collection editors (cf. Fig. 3).

Figure 3.  

A collection in RIO - for example for a topic, an event or a project - may include a diverse range of both traditional and unconventional research outputs, as well as links to publications from elsewhere (for details, see What can I publish on the RIO website).

This way, RIO collections can combine elements of traditional journal publishing (where the journal only publishes materials submitted to it) with elements of overlay journals (which pick some or all of their content from materials previously published elsewhere). This arrangement is not only interesting for projects, but also for events, organizations and communities centred around a specific topic or methodology. Apart from flexibility in terms of the source of the materials, RIO collections have also become more flexible in terms of the type of files they can accept: while articles published in RIO are natively available in the minable JATS XML, from which semantically enriched HTML and PDF versions can be generated, the inclusion of files published elsewhere into a RIO collection does not require those files to be available in XML or HTML (it can, in fact, be as easy as entering a DOI, which will then be used to fetch the relevant metadata). Thanks to the integration of the journal with the general-purpose open-access repository Zenodo, all items in a collection are automatically archived and indexed there, which further facilitates dissemination and citation.

In an example of a project collection, the EU-funded ICEDIG (Innovation and Consolidation for Large Scale Digitisation of Natural Heritage), led by several major natural history institutions, including the Natural History Museum of London, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, the French National Museum of Natural History and Helsinki University, brought together Policy Briefs, Project Reports, Research Articles and Review Papers, in order to provide a detailed overview of their own research continuum. As a result, future researchers and various stakeholders can easily piece together the key components within the project, in order to learn from, recreate or even build on the experience of ICEDIG.

Peer review

Operating with a wide range of publication types and outputs originating from different fields, RIO has made use of several separate peer review paths to accommodate the specificity of frequent-use cases aiming at strengthening the role of the community in both pre-and post-publication peer review. While it only makes sense that contributions, such as Research Articles and Review Articles, are subject to pre-publication review, the situation is different for several non-conventional research outputs, such as Grant Proposals, Workshop or Project Reports, Policy Briefs, PhD Theses or more traditional ones, such as Conference Materials, as these have often already been assessed by a relevant institution, funder, scientific conference or another legitimate organisation before submission to a journal.

We have now streamlined these workflows by more clearly specifying the two main types of manuscripts with regard to the peer-review process (see How it works section of the journal’s website for more detail):

1. Research outcomes for which pre-publication peer review is required (for example, Research Ideas, Data Papers, Software Descriptions, Methods, Research and Review Articles) and
2. Research outcomes that do not require pre-publication peer review and can be published upon a public author statement describing the quality checks and review the manuscript has passed before submission (e.g. various project deliverables); such author statements are published together with the article and are then also available via an article’s Review tab - see Raes et al. (2020) for an example.

Regardless of whether or not a submission warrants mandatory peer review or not, each manuscript is subject to editorial evaluation, in order to ensure that the content is sound and meets RIO’s standards. In addition to that, all published articles in RIO can be subject to voluntary post-publication peer review. All reviews in RIO have always been signed and published alongside the reviewed article (under the Review tab) and with their own DOI - see von Rintelen et al. (2017), for example.

For articles submitted for inclusion in RIO collections, the collection editors decide on the mode of peer review, taking guidance from RIO’s default policies.

What we have changed in the default policies is that RIO editors will not organize pre-publication peer reviews anymore. For manuscript types requiring pre-publication peer review, authors are requested to suggest suitable reviewers and these reviewers will be invited automatically by the RIO editorial management system, rather than at the discretion of RIO editors. Authors of such manuscripts can also choose to have their manuscript published as is, at present, on ARPHA Preprints, subject to editorial screening. At any time of the peer review process, however, the RIO editors will be able to invite additional reviewers independently.

Once the manuscript has received at least two positive reviews pre-publication (and fewer negative than positive ones) or an endorsement from an editor, the manuscript will be accepted for publication, unless editorial evaluation of the manuscript in the context of its reviews finds a mismatch with RIO policies (e.g. in terms of data availability).

For article types where pre-publication peer review is not mandatory, RIO will not offer pre-publication peer review anymore. Instead, unless editorial evaluation indicates otherwise, we will publish the manuscript as is and encourage post-publication reviews and comments. This is in line with broader trends to preprints in multiple disciplines and with “publish, then review” approaches being adopted by other journals as well (e.g. Eisen et al. (2020)), which also helps reduce the schism between the materials that researchers are asked to review versus those they are reading, based on their own activities and interests.

Article types

The article types already published in RIO show a great variety, but there are still more elements of the research process that could be shared more openly and RIO tries to facilitate that. We are thus exploring a range of potential new article types: a Registered Report could lay out the methodology for data yet to be acquired, an Ethics Management Plan article could outline the ethical approval process for a study, a Consent Form article could provide a blank version of a consent form used in a study, a Research Question article could zoom in on a single research question, while an Open Questions article could lay out a set of open questions in the context of a particular subject area and a Hypothesis article could be describing a single hypothesis, a Definition article a single definition, a Nanopublication article just a single factoid, a Call for Proposals article could invite funding proposals for a funding line or session proposals for an event, a Job Ad article could provide details for an open position and so on.

On the other hand, keeping information about these various - and often non-standard - article types in a structured format is not simple, so we are keeping an eye on how this could be streamlined further. This means that we are exploring mechanisms by which more generic article types - for example, for Grant Proposal articles - can be more readily adapted to specific use cases, for example, different funders or funding lines, in a way that is as much aligned with JATS best practices as possible.

Conclusion

Acknowledgements

Funding program

Grant title

Hosting institution

Ethics and security

Author contributions

Conflicts of interest

References

Abdullah N (2016)
Vertical-Horizontal Regulated Soilless Farming via Advanced Hydroponics for Domestic Food Production in Doha, Qatar
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8134
Agosti D (2016)
Shuttleworth Fellowship Application 2016
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e11014
Ahmedien D (2016)
Physics of Laser in Contemporary Visual Arts: the research protocol
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e11150
Alfieri A (2021)
Review of: An oral live attenuated vaccine strategy against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2/2019-nCoV
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e53767.r179635
Alibek K, Tskhay A (2020)
Ahead of a vaccine: A safe method of protection against COVID-19 exists
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e61709
Altenhöner R, Blümel I, Boehm F, Bove J, Bicher K, Bracht C, Brand O, Dieckmann L, Effinger M, Hagener M, Hammes A, Heller L, Kailus A, Kohle H, Ludwig J, Münzmay A, Pittroff S, Razum M, Röwenstrunk D, Sack H, Simon H, Schmidt D, Schrade T, Walzel A, Wiermann B (2020)
NFDI4Culture - Consortium for research data on material and immaterial cultural heritage
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e57036
Amosu A, Mahmood H (2018)
PyLogFinder: A Python Program for Graphical Geophysical Log Selection
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e23676
Astek A (2019)
Establishing a Need for Adding Physical Activity and Exercise Therapy Course to the Student Curriculum of the BSc Physical Therapy Program at King Abdulaziz University (KAU)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e36119
Avila-Poveda OH (2020)
Large-scale project ‘Chiton of the Mexican Tropical Pacific’: Chiton articulatus (Mollusca: Polyplacophora)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e60446
Balke M (2021)
Review of: A review of biodiversity-related issues and challenges in megadiverse Indonesia and other Southeast Asian countries
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e20860.r60604
Bingham H, Doudin M, Weatherdon L, Despot-Belmonte K, Wetzel F, Groom Q, Lewis E, Regan E, Appeltans W, Güntsch A, Mergen P, Agosti D, Penev L, Hoffmann A, Saarenmaa H, Geller G, Kim K, Kim H, Archambeau A, Häuser C, Schmeller D, Geijzendorffer I, García Camacho A, Guerra C, Robertson T, Runnel V, Valland N, Martin C (2017)
The Biodiversity Informatics Landscape: Elements, Connections and Opportunities
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14059
Borghi J, Abrams S, Lowenberg D, Simms S, Chodacki J (2018)
Support Your Data: A Research Data Management Guide for Researchers
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e26439
Borsch T, Stevens A, Häffner E, Güntsch A, Berendsohn W, Appelhans M, Barilaro C, Beszteri B, Blattner F, Bossdorf O, Dalitz H, Dressler S, Duque-Thüs R, Esser H, Franzke A, Goetze D, Grein M, Grünert U, Hellwig F, Hentschel J, Hörandl E, Janßen T, Jürgens N, Kadereit G, Karisch T, Koch M, Müller F, Müller J, Ober D, Porembski S, Poschlod P, Printzen C, Röser M, Sack P, Schlüter P, Schmidt M, Schnittler M, Scholler M, Schultz M, Seeber E, Simmel J, Stiller M, Thiv M, Thüs H, Tkach N, Triebel D, Warnke U, Weibulat T, Wesche K, Yurkov A, Zizka G (2020)
A complete digitization of German herbaria is possible, sensible and should be started now
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e50675
Bowser M, Burr S, Davis I, Dubois G, Graham E, Moan J, Swenson S (2019)
A test of metabarcoding for Early Detection and Rapid Response monitoring for non-native forest pest beetles (Coleoptera)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e48536
Briney K, Coates H, Goben A (2020)
Foundational Practices of Research Data Management
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e56508
Briz-Redón Á, Serrano-Aroca Á (2018)
Novel pedagogical tool for simultaneous learning of plane geometry and R programming
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25485
Burgelman J, Pascu C, Szkuta K, Von Schomberg R, Karalopoulos A, Repanas K, Schouppe M (2019)
Open Science, Open Data, and Open Scholarship: European Policies to Make Science Fit for the Twenty-First Century
.
Frontiers in Big Data
2
https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00043
Cardoso AC, Tsiamis K, Gervasini E, Schade S, Taucer F, Adriaens T, Copas K, Flevaris S, Galiay P, Jennings E, Josefsson M, López B, Magan J, Marchante E, Montani E, Roy H, von Schomberg R, See L, Quintas M (2017)
Citizen Science and Open Data: a model for Invasive Alien Species in Europe
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14811
Cavender-Bares J, Reich P, Townsend P, Banerjee A, Butler E, Desai A, Gevens A, Hobbie S, Isbell F, Laliberté E, Meireles JE, Menninger H, Pavlick R, Pinto-Ledezma J, Potter C, Schuman M, Springer N, Stefanski A, Trivedi P, Trowbridge A, Williams L, Willis C, Yang Y (2021)
BII-Implementation: The causes and consequences of plant biodiversity across scales in a rapidly changing world
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
7
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.7.e63850
Changeux J, Goulas A, Hilgetag C (2021)
A Connectomic Hypothesis for the Hominization of the Brain
.
Cerebral Cortex
31
(
5
):
2425
‑
2449
. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa365
Chen R, Yu Y (2016)
Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells and somatic cardiac regeneration — An exploratory bioinformatic analysis
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8801
Chodacki J, Lemberger T, Lin J, Martone M, Mietchen D, Polka J, Sever R, Strasser C (2017)
Technical aspects of preprint services in the life sciences: a workshop report
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e11825
Cirillo M (2020)
Ring-first Mitral Valve Repair
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e62369
Cole M (2018)
Effectiveness of peer-mediated learning for English language learners: A meta-analysis
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e29375
Criscuolo A (2019)
A fast alignment-free bioinformatics procedure to infer accurate distance-based phylogenetic trees from genome assemblies
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e36178
Cuenca-Garcia C, Armstrong K, Aidona E, De Smedt P, Rosveare A, Rosveare M, Schneidhofer P, Wilson C, Faßbinder J, Moffat I, Sarris A, Scheiblecker M, Jrad A, van Leusen M, Lowe K (2018)
THE SOIL SCIENCE & ARCHAEO-GEOPHYSICS ALLIANCE (SAGA): going beyond prospection
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e31648
Cunha MR, Gnio L, Pradillon F, Clavel Henry M, Beaulieu S, Birch J, Campuzano FJ, Carretn M, De Leo F, Gula J, Laming S, Lindsay D, Matos FL, Metaxas A, Meyer-Kaiser K, Mills S, Queiroga H, Rodrigues CF, Sarrazin J, Watanabe H, Young R, Young CM (2020)
Foresight Workshop on Advances in Ocean Biological Observations: a sustained system for deep-ocean meroplankton
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e54284
Datry T, Singer G, Sauquet E, Jorda-Capdevila D, Von Schiller D, Stubbington R, Magand C, Pařil P, Miliša M, Acuña V, Alves MH, Augeard B, Brunke M, Cid N, Csabai Z, England J, Froebrich J, Koundouri P, Lamouroux N, Martí E, Morais M, Munné A, Mutz M, Pesic V, Previšić A, Reynaud A, Robinson C, Sadler J, Skoulikidis N, Terrier B, Tockner K, Vesely D, Zoppini A (2017)
Science and Management of Intermittent Rivers and Ephemeral Streams (SMIRES)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e21774
Despot-Belmonte K, Doudin M, Groom Q, Wetzel F, Agosti D, Jacobsen K, Smirnova L, Weatherdon L, Robertson T, Penev L, Regan E, Hoffmann A, MacSharry B, Shennan-Farpon Y, Martin C (2017)
EU BON’s contributions towards meeting Aichi Biodiversity Target 19
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14013
Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission) (2020)
Scholarly infrastructures for research software
.
Report from the EOSC Executive Board Working Group (WG) Architecture Task Force (TF) SIRS
. https://doi.org/10.2777/28598
Doran M, Barnett A, Leach J, Lott W, Page K, Grant W (2017)
Can video improve grant review quality and lead to more reliable ranking?
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e11931
Drazen J, Smith C, Gjerde K, Au W, Black J, Carter G, Clark M, Durden J, Dutrieux P, Goetze E, Haddock S, Hatta M, Hauton C, Hill P, Koslow J, Leitner A, Measures C, Pacini A, Parrish F, Peacock T, Perelman J, Sutton T, Taymans C, Tunnicliffe V, Watling L, Yamamoto H, Young E, Ziegler A (2019)
Report of the workshop Evaluating the nature of midwater mining plumes and their potential effects on midwater ecosystems
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e33527
Duque R (2021)
Review of: Open comments on the Task Force SIRS report: Scholarly Infrastructures for Research Software (EOSC Executive Board, EOSCArchitecture)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
7
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.7.e63872.r268686
Egloff W, Agosti D, Patterson D, Hoffmann A, Mietchen D, Kishor P, Penev L (2016)
Data Policy Recommendations for Biodiversity Data. EU BON Project Report
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8458
Egloff W, Agosti D, Kishor P, Patterson D, Miller J (2017)
Copyright and the Use of Images as Biodiversity Data
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12502
Eisenhauer N, Ferlian O, Craven D, Hines J, Jochum M (2019)
Ecosystem responses to exotic earthworm invasion in northern North American forests
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e34564
Eisen MB, Akhmanova A, Behrens TE, Harper DM, Weigel D, Zaidi M (2020)
Implementing a "publish, then review" model of publishing
.
eLife
9
https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.64910
Ek K, Goytia S, Lundmark C, Nysten-Haarala S, Pettersson M, Sandström A, Söderasp J, Stage J (2017)
Challenges in Swedish hydropower – politics, economics and rights
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e21305
ElSabry E (2017)
Mapping Open Access Societal Impact
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e11743
Faulwetter S, Pafilis E, Fanini L, Bailly N, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Boicenco L, Catapano T, Claus S, Dekeyzer S, Georgiev T, Legaki A, Mavraki D, Oulas A, Papastefanou G, Penev L, Sautter G, Schigel D, Senderov V, Teaca A, Tsompanou M (2016)
EMODnet Workshop on mechanisms and guidelines to mobilise historical data into biogeographic databases
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10445
Fey J, Anderson S (2016)
Boulder Creek Critical Zone Observatory Data Management Plan
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9419
Fišer Ž, Aronne G, Aavik T, Akin M, Alizoti P, Aravanopoulos F, Bacchetta G, Balant M, Ballian D, Barazani O, Bellia AF, Bernhardt N, Bou Dagher Kharrat M, Bugeja Douglas A, Burkart M, Ćalić D, Carapeto A, Carlsen T, Castro S, Colling G, Cursach J, Cvetanoska S, Cvetkoska C, Ćušterevska R, Daco L, Danova K, Dervishi A, Djukanović G, Dragićević S, Ensslin A, Evju M, Fenu G, Francisco A, Gallego PP, Galloni M, Ganea A, Gemeinholzer B, Glasnović P, Godefroid S, Goul Thomsen M, Halassy M, Helm A, Hyvärinen M, Joshi J, Kazić A, Kiehn M, Klisz M, Kool A, Koprowski M, Kövendi-Jakó A, Kříž K, Kropf M, Kull T, Lanfranco S, Lazarević P, Lazarević M, Lebel Vine M, Liepina L, Loureiro J, Lukminė D, Machon N, Meade C, Metzing D, Milanović Đ, Navarro L, Orlović S, Panis B, Pankova H, Parpan T, Pašek O, Peci D, Petanidou T, Plenk K, Puchałka R, Radosavljević I, Rankou H, Rašomavičius V, Romanciuc G, Ruotsalainen A, Šajna N, Salaj T, Sánchez-Romero C, Sarginci M, Schäfer D, Seberg O, Sharrock S, Šibík J, Šibíková M, Skarpaas O, Stanković Neđić M, Stojnic S, Surina B, Szitár K, Teofilovski A, Thoroddsen R, Tsvetkov I, Uogintas D, Van Meerbeek K, van Rooijen N, Vassiliou L, Verbylaitė R, Vergeer P, Vít P, Walczak M, Widmer A, Wiland-Szymańska J, Zdunić G, Zippel E (2021)
ConservePlants: An integrated approach to conservation of threatened plants for the 21st Century
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
7
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.7.e62810
Fisher J, Nading A (2016)
A Political Ecology of Value: A Cohort-Based Ethnography of the Environmental Turn in Nicaraguan Urban Social Policy
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
:
8720
‑
1
. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8720
Franz N, Gilbert E, Ludäscher B, Weakley A (2016)
Controlling the taxonomic variable: Taxonomic concept resolution for a southeastern United States herbarium portal
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10610
Fraser N, Brierley L, Dey G, Polka J, Pálfy M, Nanni F, Coates JA (2021)
The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape
.
PLOS Biology
19
(
4
). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000959
Freitag H (2021)
Review of: A review of biodiversity-related issues and challenges in megadiverse Indonesia and other Southeast Asian countries
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e20860.r60603
Gatto L (2017)
Data Management Plan for a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Tools and Resources Development Fund (TRDF) Grant
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e11624
Gerovasileiou V, Martínez A, Álvarez F, Boxshall G, Humphreys W, Jaume D, Becking L, Muricy G, van Hengstum P, Dekeyzer S, Decock W, Vanhoorne B, Vandepitte L, Bailly N, Iliffe T (2016)
World Register of marine Cave Species (WoRCS): a new Thematic Species Database for marine and anchialine cave biodiversity
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10451
Glover A, Dahlgren T, Taboada S, Paterson G, Wiklund H, Waeschenbach A, Cobley A, Martínez P, Kaiser S, Schnurr S, Khodami S, Raschka U, Kersken D, Stuckas H, Menot L, Bonifacio P, Vanreusel A, Macheriotou L, Cunha M, Hilário A, Rodrigues C, Colaço A, Ribeiro P, Błażewicz M, Gooday A, Jones D, Billett D, Goineau A, Amon D, Smith C, Patel T, McQuaid K, Spickermann R, Brager S (2016)
The London Workshop on the Biogeography and Connectivity of the Clarion-Clipperton Zone
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10528
Gomez-Diaz T, Recio T (2021)
Open comments on the Task Force SIRS report: Scholarly Infrastructures for Research Software (EOSC Executive Board, EOSCArchitecture)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
7
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.7.e63872
Griggs D, Stafford-Smith M, Gaffney O, Rockström J, Öhman M, Shyamsundar P, Steffen W, Glaser G, Kanie N, Noble I (2013)
Sustainable development goals for people and planet
.
Nature
495
(
7441
):
305
‑
307
. https://doi.org/10.1038/495305a
Haak L, Greene S, Ratan K (2020)
A New Research Economy: Socio-technical framework to open up lines of credit in the academic community
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e60477
Hammond C (2016)
Widening the circle of care: An arts-based, participatory dialogue with stakeholders on cancer care for First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples in Ontario, Canada
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9115
Hardisty A, Saarenmaa H, Casino A, Dillen M, Gödderz K, Groom Q, Hardy H, Koureas D, Nieva de la Hidalga A, Paul D, Runnel V, Vermeersch X, van Walsum M, Willemse L (2020)
Conceptual design blueprint for the DiSSCo digitization infrastructure - DELIVERABLE D8.1
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e54280
Hardy H, van Walsum M, Livermore L, Walton S (2020)
Research and development in robotics with potential to automate handling of biological collections
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e61366
Hartgerink C, George S (2015)
Problematic trial detection in ClinicalTrials.gov
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
1
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.1.e7462
Hartgerink C, Wicherts J, van Assen M (2016)
The value of statistical tools to detect data fabrication
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8860
Hausken S, Barker-Ruchti N, Schubring A, Grau S (2018)
Injury-Free Children and Adolescents: Towards Better Practice in Swedish Football (FIT project)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e30729
Howell K, Davies J, Allcock AL, Braga-Henriques A, Buhl-Mortensen P, Carreiro-Silva M, Dominguez-Carrió C, Durden J, Foster N, Game C, Hitchin B, Horton T, Hosking B, Jones DB, Mah C, Laguionie Marchais C, Menot L, Morato T, Pearman TR, Piechaud N, Ross R, Ruhl H, Saeedi H, Stefanoudis P, Taranto G, Thompson M, Taylor J, Tyler P, Vad J, Victorero L, Vieira R, Woodall L, Xavier J, Wagner D (2019)
A framework for the development of a global standardised marine taxon reference image database (SMarTaR-ID) to support image-based analyses
.
PLOS ONE
14
(
12
). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218904
Ioanas H, Saab B, Rudin M (2017)
Gentoo Linux for Neuroscience - a replicable, flexible, scalable, rolling-release environment that provides direct access to development software
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12095
Irawan D, Putranto T, Darul A (2018)
Groundwater quality dataset of Semarang area, Indonesia
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e29319
Irawan D (2021)
Review of: A review of biodiversity-related issues and challenges in megadiverse Indonesia and other Southeast Asian countries
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e20860.r151965
Jay C, Haines R, Vigo M, Matentzoglu N, Stevens R, Boyle J, Davies A, Del Vescovo C, Gruel N, Le Blanc A, Mawdsley D, Mellor D, Mikroyannidi E, Rollins R, Rowley A, Vega J (2017)
Identifying the challenges of code/theory translation: report from the Code/Theory 2017 workshop
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e13236
Joint Research Centre (2020)
Activity report on citizen science - discoveries from a five year journey
.
KJ-NA-30551-EN-N
. https://doi.org/10.2760/841551
Joschinski J (2016)
Benefits and costs of aphid phenological bet-hedging strategies
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9580
Joseph P (2018)
Eliminating disparities and implicit bias in health care delivery by utilizing a hub-and-spoke model
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e26370
Kaiser K, Kemp J, Paglione L, Ratner H, Schott D, Williams H (2020)
Methods & Proposal for Metadata Guiding Principles for Scholarly Communications
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e53916
Kelly-Quinn M, Bruen M, Carlsson J, Gurnell A, Jarvie H, Piggott J (2019)
Managing the small stream network for improved water quality, biodiversity and ecosystem services protection (SSNet)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e33400
Keshavan A, Klein A, Cipollini B (2017)
Interactive online brain shape visualization
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12358
Kissling WD, Seijmonsbergen A, Foppen R, Bouten W (2017)
eEcoLiDAR, eScience infrastructure for ecological applications of LiDAR point clouds: reconstructing the 3D ecosystem structure for animals at regional to continental scales
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14939
Kittrie E, Atienza A, Kiley R, Carr D, MacFarlane A, Pai V, Couch J, Bajkowski J, Bonner J, Mietchen D, Bourne P (2017)
Developing international open science collaborations: Funder reflections on the Open Science Prize
.
PLOS Biology
15
(
8
). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002617
Klein A (2016)
A game for crowdsourcing the segmentation of BigBrain data
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8816
Klein A, Ghosh S (2016)
A Million Brains in the Cloud
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8812
Koureas D, Arvanitidis C, Belbin L, Berendsohn W, Damgaard C, Groom Q, Güntsch A, Hagedorn G, Hardisty A, Hobern D, Marcer A, Mietchen D, Morse D, Obst M, Penev L, Pettersson L, Sierra S, Smith V, Vos R (2016)
Community engagement: The ‘last mile’ challenge for European research e-infrastructures
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9933
Kramer B, Bosman J, Ignac M, Kral C, Kalleinen T, Koskinen P, Bruno I, Buckland A, Callaghan S, Champieux R, Chapman C, Hagstrom S, Martone M, Murphy F, O'Donnell D (2016)
Defining the Scholarly Commons - Reimagining Research Communication. Report of Force11 SCWG Workshop, Madrid, Spain, February 25-27, 2016
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9340
Kröger B, Kuusijärvi A, Myllys L, Sihvonen P, Ståhls-Mäkelä G, Väre H, Oinonen M, Juslén A, Schulman L, Hyvärinen M (2021)
Palaeontology Collection Policy
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
7
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.7.e62808
Lahti L, da Silva F, Laine M, Lähteenoja V, Tolonen M (2019)
Alchemy & algorithms: perspectives on the philosophy and history of open science
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e35913
Lange Canhos DA (2017)
Data Management Plan: Brazil's Virtual Herbarium
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14675
Lapin K, Bindewald A, Kraxner F, Marinšek A, La Porta N, Hazarika R, Chakraborty D, Oettel J, Berger F, Detry P, Kolesaric G, Baric D, Abluton S, Ulrici G, Georges I, Schweinzer KM, Schüler S (2020)
A transnational cooperation for sustainable use and management of non-native trees in urban, peri-urban and forest ecosystems in the Alpine region (ALPTREES)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e53038
Leese F, Altermatt F, Bouchez A, Ekrem T, Hering D, Meissner K, Mergen P, Pawlowski J, Piggott J, Rimet F, Steinke D, Taberlet P, Weigand A, Abarenkov K, Beja P, Bervoets L, Björnsdóttir S, Boets P, Boggero A, Bones A, Borja Á, Bruce K, Bursić V, Carlsson J, Čiampor F, Čiamporová-Zatovičová Z, Coissac E, Costa F, Costache M, Creer S, Csabai Z, Deiner K, DelValls Á, Drakare S, Duarte S, Eleršek T, Fazi S, Fišer C, Flot J, Fonseca V, Fontaneto D, Grabowski M, Graf W, Guðbrandsson J, Hellström M, Hershkovitz Y, Hollingsworth P, Japoshvili B, Jones J, Kahlert M, Kalamujic Stroil B, Kasapidis P, Kelly M, Kelly-Quinn M, Keskin E, Kõljalg U, Ljubešić Z, Maček I, Mächler E, Mahon A, Marečková M, Mejdandzic M, Mircheva G, Montagna M, Moritz C, Mulk V, Naumoski A, Navodaru I, Padisák J, Pálsson S, Panksep K, Penev L, Petrusek A, Pfannkuchen M, Primmer C, Rinkevich B, Rotter A, Schmidt-Kloiber A, Segurado P, Speksnijder A, Stoev P, Strand M, Šulčius S, Sundberg P, Traugott M, Tsigenopoulos C, Turon X, Valentini A, van der Hoorn B, Várbíró G, Vasquez Hadjilyra M, Viguri J, Vitonytė I, Vogler A, Vrålstad T, Wägele W, Wenne R, Winding A, Woodward G, Zegura B, Zimmermann J (2016)
DNAqua-Net: Developing new genetic tools for bioassessment and monitoring of aquatic ecosystems in Europe
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e11321
Lin J, Fenner M (2013)
Altmetrics in Evolution: Defining and Redefining the Ontology of Article-Level Metrics
.
Information Standards Quarterly
25
(
2
). https://doi.org/10.3789/isqv25no2.2013.04
Lin R, Fang Q, Wu B (2020)
Hydro-graph: A knowledge graph for hydrogen research trends and relations
.
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
45
(
39
):
20408
‑
20418
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.036
Lobo G (2021)
A Critique of Searle’s Linguistic Exceptionalism
.
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393121995581
Lu Y, Nakicenovic N, Visbeck M, Stevance A (2015)
Policy: Five priorities for the UN Sustainable Development Goals
.
Nature
520
(
7548
):
432
‑
433
. https://doi.org/10.1038/520432a
Madan C (2016)
Improved understanding of brain morphology through 3D printing: A brief guide
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10398
Marek P (2017)
Ultraviolet-induced fluorescent imaging for millipede taxonomy
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14850
Mariani P (2018)
Jellyfish Identification Software for Underwater Laser Cameras (JTRACK)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e24716
Martone M, Murray-Rust P, Molloy J, Arrow T, MacGillivray M, Kittel C, Kasberger S, Steel G, Oppenheim C, Ranganathan A, Tennant J, Udell J (2016)
ContentMine/Hypothes.is Proposal
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8424
Mattsson B, Toth W, Penker M, Kieninger P, Vacik H (2020)
Drivers and value tradeoffs of regional-scale adaptation in rural landscapes of central Europe
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e53608
Maumet C, Nichols T (2017)
Generating and reporting peak and cluster tables for voxel-wise inference in FSL
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12368
Mietchen D, Mounce R, Penev L (2015a)
Publishing the research process
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
1
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.1.e7547
Mietchen D, Hagedorn G, Willighagen E, Rico M, Gómez-Pérez A, Aibar E, Rafes K, Germain C, Dunning A, Pintscher L, Kinzler D (2015b)
Enabling Open Science: Wikidata for Research (Wiki4R)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
1
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.1.e7573
Mietchen D (2019)
A wiki approach to collecting, curating and managing citizen science data
.
Zenodo
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2560018
Mietchen D, Li J (2020)
Quantifying the Impact of Data Sharing on Outbreak Dynamics (QIDSOD)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e54770
Minelli A, Oggioni A, Pugnetti A, Sarretta A, Bastianini M, Bergami C, Bernardi Aubry F, Camatti E, Scovacricchi T, Socal G (2018)
The project EcoNAOS: vision and practice towards an open approach in the Northern Adriatic Sea ecological observatory
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e24224
Mirea M, Manolache S, Pioarca-Ciocanea C, Nita A, Miu I, Popescu V, Brodie B, Dragomir M, Militaru I, Chiriac S, Rozylowicz L (2021)
Conservation of saproxylic beetles in the Carpathians
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
7
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.7.e63874
Moldovan OT, Øvrevik Skoglund R, Banciu HL, Dinu Cucoș A, Levei EA, Perșoiu A, Lauritzen S (2019)
Monitoring and risk assessment for groundwater sources in rural communities of Romania (GROUNDWATERISK)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e48898
Molino JV, Lubiana Alves T, Ferreira-Camargo L, Croce M, Tanaka A, Buson F, Ribeiro P, Campos-Salazar A, Antonio E, Maizel A, Siratuti V, Costa C, Wlodarczyk S, de Souza Lima R, Mello F, Mayfield S, Carvalho J (2016)
Chimeric spider silk production in microalgae: a modular bionanomaterial
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9342
Monachino S, McDermott EJ, Maia Chagas A (2018)
Building and hacking open source hardware
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e31701
Mounce R, Murray-Rust P, Wills M (2017)
A machine-compiled microbial supertree from figure-mining thousands of papers
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e13589
Müller C, Bräutigam A, Eilers E, Junker R, Schnitzler J, Steppuhn A, Unsicker S, van Dam N, Weisser W, Wittmann M (2020)
Ecology and Evolution of Intraspecific Chemodiversity of Plants
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e49810
Nche G (2020)
The Religion-Environment (Climate Change) Connection
.
Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology
24
(
1
):
81
‑
115
. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685357-20201004
Neittaanmäki P, Huttula T, Karvanen J, Frisk T, Tuomisto J, Simola A, Tuovinen T, Ropponen J (2016)
Unicorn–Open science for assessing environmental state, human health and regional economy
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9232
Neylon C, Chan L (2016)
Exploring the opportunities and challenges of implementing open research strategies within development institutions
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8880
Neylon C (2017)
Case Study: Indigenous Knowledge and Data Sharing
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e21704
Nichols H, Stolze S (2016)
Migration of legacy data to new media formats for long-time storage and maximum visibility: Modern pollen data from the Canadian Arctic (1972/1973)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10269
Padilla-Sanchez V (2020)
In silico analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and insights into antibody binding
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e55281
Padilla-Sanchez V (2021)
SARS-CoV-2 Structural Analysis of Receptor Binding Domain New Variants from United Kingdom and South Africa
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
7
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.7.e62936
Page R (2016)
Towards a biodiversity knowledge graph
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8767
Panicker M (2021)
Review of: An oral live attenuated vaccine strategy against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2/2019-nCoV
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e53767.r179633
Pannell J (2016)
Data Management Plan for PhD Thesis "Climatic Limitation of Alien Weeds in New Zealand: Enhancing Species Distribution Models with Field Data"
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10600
Penev L, Mietchen D, Chavan V, Hagedorn G, Smith V, Shotton D, Ó Tuama É, Senderov V, Georgiev T, Stoev P, Groom Q, Remsen D, Edmunds S (2017)
Strategies and guidelines for scholarly publishing of biodiversity data
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12431
Pericleous C, Eliades N (2020)
An approach for the mass propagation of Cupressus sempervirens L. (Cupressaceae), for quality propagule production
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e52947
Perumal N (2020)
Review of: An oral live attenuated vaccine strategy against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2/2019-nCoV
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e53767.r179634
Petersen M, Pramann B, Toepfer R, Neumann J, Enke H, Hoffmann J, Mauer R (2020)
Research Data Management - Current status and future challenges for German non-university research institutions
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e55141
Peterson D (2017)
Streamlining the Process of 3D Printing a Brain From a Structural MRI
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e13394
Philipson J (2016)
Citation functions revisited: learning from the princes
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9651
Prieß-Buchheit J, Aro A, Demirova I, Lanzerath D, Stoev P, Wilder N (2020)
Rotatory role-playing and role-models to enhance the research integrity culture
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e53921
Prylutskyi O, Abrahamyan A, Voronova N, Aloyan T, Borodin O, Darmostuk V, Gasparyan N, Ivanova N, Johaadien R, Khachatryan H, Krasovskii S, Krishin G, Kulikova A, Kurbonbekova S, Makeyeva E, Savchenko A, Mamadalieva M, Melikyan A, Mirzorakhimov A, Movsisyan A, Mubalieva S, Novikov A, Russell L, Shashkov M, Sheriko A, Schigel D, Sysoliatin E, Tykarski P, Verstraete B, Yatsiuk I, Zykova M, Endresen D, De Boer H (2019)
BioDATA - Biodiversity Data for Internationalisation in Higher Education
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e36276
Raes N, Casino A, Goodson H, Islam S, Koureas D, Schiller EK, Schulman L, Tilley L, Robertson T (2020)
White paper on the alignment and interoperability between the Distributed System of Scientific Collections (DiSSCo) and EU infrastructures - The case of the European Environment Agency (EEA)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e62361
Rasberry L, Willighagen E, Nielsen F, Mietchen D (2019)
Robustifying Scholia: paving the way for knowledge discovery and research assessment through Wikidata
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e35820
Rasberry L, Mietchen D (2021)
FAIR and open multilingual clinical trials in Wikidata and Wikipedia
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
7
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.7.e66490
Rivera-Vega L, Mikó I (2017)
Know your insect: Malpighian tubules in Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e11827
Romero Jr. A (2016)
The influence of religion on science: the case of the idea of predestination in biospeleology
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9015
Rotter A, Barbier M, Bertoni F, Bones AM, et al. (2021)
The Essentials of Marine Biotechnology
.
Frontiers in Marine Science
8
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.629629
Roy H, Groom Q, Adriaens T, Agnello G, Antic M, Archambeau A, Bacher S, Bonn A, Brown P, Brundu G, López B, Cleary M, Cogălniceanu D, de Groot M, De Sousa T, Deidun A, Essl F, Fišer Pečnikar Ž, Gazda A, Gervasini E, Glavendekic M, Gigot G, Jelaska S, Jeschke J, Kaminski D, Karachle P, Komives T, Lapin K, Lucy F, Marchante E, Marisavljevic D, Marja R, Martín Torrijos L, Martinou A, Matosevic D, Mifsud C, Motiejūnaitė J, Ojaveer H, Pasalic N, Pekárik L, Per E, Pergl J, Pesic V, Pocock M, Reino L, Ries C, Rozylowicz L, Schade S, Sigurdsson S, Steinitz O, Stern N, Teofilovski A, Thorsson J, Tomov R, Tricarico E, Trichkova T, Tsiamis K, van Valkenburg J, Vella N, Verbrugge L, Vétek G, Villaverde C, Witzell J, Zenetos A, Cardoso AC (2018)
Increasing understanding of alien species through citizen science (Alien-CSI)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e31412
Runnel V, Wetzel F, Groom Q, Koch W, Pe’er I, Valland N, Panteri E, Kõljalg U (2016)
Summary report and strategy recommendations for EU citizen science gateway for biodiversity data
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e11563
Rusch J, Mojžišová M, Strand D, Svobodová J, Vrålstad T, Petrusek A (2020)
Simultaneous detection of native and invasive crayfish and Aphanomyces astaci from environmental DNA samples in a wide range of habitats in Central Europe
.
NeoBiota
58
:
1
‑
32
. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.58.49358
Sachs J, Page R, Baskauf SJ, Pender J, Lujan-Toro B, Macklin J, Comspon Z (2019)
Training and hackathon on building biodiversity knowledge graphs
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e36152
Samuel S, Shadaydeh M, Böcker S, Brügmann B, Bucher SF, Deckert V, Denzler J, Dittrich P, von Eggeling F, Güllmar D, Guntinas-Lichius O, König-Ries B, Löffler F, Maicher L, Marz M, Migliavacca M, R. Reichenbach J, Reichstein M, Römermann C, Wittig A (2020)
A virtual “Werkstatt” for digitization in the sciences
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e54106
Sanal MG, Dubey RC (2020)
An oral live attenuated vaccine strategy against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2/2019-nCoV)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e53767
Sancho-Chavarria L, Beck F, Weiskopf D, Mata-Montero E (2018)
Task-based assessment of visualization tools for the comparison of biological taxonomies
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25742
Sarja J (2017)
Compartmentalized reference list in an academic publication: Helping the reader to gain a more comprehensive understanding of an academic paper
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12408
Schade S, Herding W, Fellermann A, Kotsev A, Gerboles M, Borowiak A (2019)
Joint Statement on new opportunities for air quality sensing - lower-cost sensors for public authorities and citizen science initiatives
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e37478
Schoening T, Durden J, Preuss I, Branzan Albu A, Purser A, De Smet B, Dominguez-Carrió C, Yesson C, de Jonge D, Lindsay D, Schulz J, Möller KO, Beisiegel K, Kuhnz L, Hoeberechts M, Piechaud N, Sharuga S, Treibitz T (2017)
Report on the Marine Imaging Workshop 2017
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e13820
Seltmann K, Lafia S, Paul D, James S, Bloom D, Rios N, Ellis S, Farrell U, Utrup J, Yost M, Davis E, Emery R, Motz G, Kimmig J, Shirey V, Sandall E, Park D, Tyrrell C, Thackurdeen RS, Collins M, O'Leary V, Prestridge H, Evelyn C, Nyberg B (2018)
Georeferencing for Research Use (GRU): An integrated geospatial training paradigm for biocollections researchers and data providers
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e32449
Senapati S, Dash J, Sethi M, Chakraborty S (2020)
Bioengineered probiotics to control SARS-CoV-2 infection
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e54802
Senderov V, Penev L (2016)
The Open Biodiversity Knowledge Management System in Scholarly Publishing
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e7757
Senderov V, Georgiev T, Penev L (2016)
Online direct import of specimen records into manuscripts and automatic creation of data papers from biological databases
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10617
Simms S, Jones S, Ashley K, Ribeiro M, Chodacki J, Abrams S, Strong M (2016)
Roadmap: A Research Data Management Advisory Platform
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8649
Simms S, Jones S, Mietchen D, Miksa T (2017)
Machine-actionable data management plans (maDMPs)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e13086
Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Peer I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016)
Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390
Smith C, Todd M, Patiny L, Swain C, Southan C, Williamson A, Clark A (2016)
SCINDR - The SCience INtroDuction Robot that will Connect Open Scientists
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9995
Smith V, Georgiev T, Stoev P, Biserkov J, Miller J, Livermore L, Baker E, Mietchen D, Couvreur T, Mueller G, Dikow T, Helgen K, Frank J, Agosti D, Roberts D, Penev L (2013)
Beyond dead trees: integrating the scientific process in the Biodiversity Data Journal
.
Biodiversity Data Journal
1
https://doi.org/10.3897/bdj.1.e995
Smith V, Gorman K, Addink W, Arvanitidis C, Casino A, Dixey K, Dröge G, Groom Q, Haston E, Hobern D, Knapp S, Koureas D, Livermore L, Seberg O (2019)
SYNTHESYS+ Abridged Grant Proposal
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e46404
Spencer-Cavaliere N (2021)
Review of: Injury-Free Children and Adolescents: Towards Better Practice in Swedish Football (FIT project)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e30729.r106180
Stefanoudis P, Talma S, Samimi-Namin K, Woodall L (2020)
Deep reef ecosystems of the Western Indian Ocean: addressing the great unknown
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e53913
Stehle M, Lasseck M, Khorramshahi O, Sturm U (2020)
Evaluation of acoustic pattern recognition of nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) recordings by citizens
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e50233
Steinbeck C, Koepler O, Bach F, Herres-Pawlis S, Jung N, Liermann J, Neumann S, Razum M, Baldauf C, Biedermann F, Bocklitz T, Boehm F, Broda F, Czodrowski P, Engel T, Hicks M, Kast S, Kettner C, Koch W, Lanza G, Link A, Mata R, Nagel W, Porzel A, Schlörer N, Schulze T, Weinig H, Wenzel W, Wessjohann L, Wulle S (2020)
NFDI4Chem - Towards a National Research Data Infrastructure for Chemistry in Germany
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e55852
Sturm U, Schade S, Ceccaroni L, Gold M, Kyba C, Claramunt B, Haklay M, Kasperowski D, Albert A, Piera J, Brier J, Kullenberg C, Luna S (2018)
Defining principles for mobile apps and platforms development in citizen science
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e23394
Sugiharto S, Bintoro N, Karyadi J, Pranoto Y (2020)
Supercritical carbon dioxide pasteurization to reduce the activity of muscle protease and its impact on physicochemical properties of Nile tilapia
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e56887
Susi T (2015)
Heteroatom quantum corrals and nanoplasmonics in graphene (HeQuCoG)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
1
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.1.e7479
Susi T (2018)
Review of: Gravitational Wave Speed: Undefined
.
Experiments Proposed. Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e25606.r78989
Tanaka H (2020)
Imagination and Brand:
.
Japan Marketing Journal
39
(
3
):
7
‑
20
. https://doi.org/10.7222/marketing.2020.004
Tilley L, Berning B, Erdei B, Fassoulas C, Kroh A, Kvaček J, Mergen P, Michellier C, Miller C, Rasser M, Schmitt R, Kovar-Eder J (2019)
Hazards and disasters in the geological and geomorphological record: a key to understanding past and future hazards and disasters
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e34087
Tóth J (2016)
Historical analysis of strategies for assimilation and identity maintenance in dispersed groups of overseas Hungarians and their relevance regarding national policy planning
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8861
Underwood E, Grace M (2017)
The use of biodiversity data in rural development programming
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e20369
Underwood E, Taylor K, Tucker G (2018)
The use of biodiversity data in spatial planning and impact assessment in Europe
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e28045
Valatin G, Abildtrup J, Accastello C, Al-Tawaha AR, Andreucci M, Atanasova S, Avdibegović M, Baksic N, Banasik K, Barquin J, Barstad J, Bastakova V, Becirovic D, Begueria S, Bethers U, Bihunova M, Blagojevic B, Bösch M, Bournaris T, Cao Y, Carvalho-Santos C, Chikalanov A, Cunha e Sá M, Czyżyk K, Daly H, Davies H, Del Campo A, Groot Rd, De Vreese R, Dostál T, El Mokaddem A, Finér L, Evans R, Fiquepron J, Frac M, Futter M, Garcia S, Gatto P, Geneletti D, Gezik V, Giupponi C, González-Sanchís M, Gordillo F, Gorriz E, Grigorova Y, Heinsoo K, Hochbichler E, Högbom L, Image M, Jacobsen J, Japelj A, Jelic S, Junk J, Juhasz C, Kagalou I, Kelly-Quinn M, Klamerus-Iwan A, Kluvankova T, Koeck R, Konovska I, Ostoic S, Krc J, Lavnyy V, Leonardi A, Libiete Z, Little D, Lo Porto A, Loukas A, Lyubenova M, Maric B, Martínez-López J, Martinez I, Maxim A, Metslaid M, Melvin A, Costică M, Mincev I, Morkvenas Z, Nevenic R, Nisbet T, O'hUallachain D, Olschewski R, Östberg J, Oszust K, Ovando P, Paletto A, Parpan T, Pettenella D, Malovrh Š, Planinšek Š, Podlipná R, Posavec S, Potočki K, Prokofieva I, Quinteiro P, Radocz L, Ristic R, Robert N, Rugani B, Sabanovic J, Sarvasova Z, Savoska S, Schleppi P, Schueler G, Shannon M, Silgram M, Srdjevic B, Stefan G, Stijovic A, Strange N, Tattari S, Teofilovski A, Termansen M, Thorsen B, Toth A, Trebs I, Tmušić N, Vasiliades L, Vedel S, Ventrubová K, Vuletic D, Winkel G, Yao R, Young S, Yousefpour R, Zahvoyska L, Zhang D, Zhou J, Žižková E (2017)
PESFOR-W: Improving the design and environmental effectiveness of woodlands for water Payments for Ecosystem Services
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e13828
Vanderhoeven S, Adriaens T, Desmet P, Strubbe D, Backeljau T, Barbier Y, Brosens D, Cigar J, Coupremanne M, De Troch R, Eggermont H, Heughebaert A, Hostens K, Huybrechts P, Jacquemart A, Lens L, Monty A, Paquet J, Prévot C, Robertson T, Termonia P, Van De Kerchove R, Van Hoey G, Van Schaeybroeck B, Vercayie D, Verleye T, Welby S, Groom Q (2017)
Tracking Invasive Alien Species (TrIAS): Building a data-driven framework to inform policy
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e13414
Van Tuyl S, Whitmire A (2018)
Investigation of Non-Academic Data Management Practices to Inform Academic Research Data Management
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e30829
Véron R, Fernando N, Narayanan NC, Upreti B, Ambat B, Pallawala R, Rajbhandari S, Rao Dhananka S, Zurbrügg C (2018)
Social processes in post-crisis municipal solid waste management innovations: A proposal for research and knowledge exchange in South Asia
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
4
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e31430
Vohland K, Häuser C, Regan E, Hoffmann A, Wetzel F (2016a)
2nd EU BON Stakeholder Roundtable (Berlin, Germany): How can a European biodiversity network support citizen science?
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8616
Vohland K, Hoffmann A, Underwood E, Weatherdon L, Bonet F, Huser C, Wetzel F (2016b)
3rd EU BON Stakeholder Roundtable (Granada, Spain): Biodiversity data workflow from data mobilization to practice
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8622
Vollan B (2019)
The shadow of the future and the shadow of the past: Studying the impact of climate change on human behaviour
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e34451
von Rintelen K, Arida E, Häuser C (2017)
A review of biodiversity-related issues and challenges in megadiverse Indonesia and other Southeast Asian countries
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e20860
Vyshedskiy A, Dunn R (2015)
Mental synthesis involves the synchronization of independent neuronal ensembles
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
1
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.1.e7642
Vyshedskiy A, Dunn R, Piryatinsky I (2017)
Neurobiological mechanisms for nonverbal IQ tests: implications for instruction of nonverbal children with autism
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e13239
Vyshedskiy A (2019)
Language evolution to revolution: the leap from rich-vocabulary non-recursive communication system to recursive language 70,000 years ago was associated with acquisition of a novel component of imagination, called Prefrontal Synthesis, enabled by a mutation that slowed down the prefrontal cortex maturation simultaneously in two or more children – the Romulus and Remus hypothesis
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
5
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e38546
Wael R (2017)
Data Management Plan: HarassMap
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e15133
Wagner S (2015)
Continuous and Focused Developer Feedback on Software Quality (CoFoDeF)
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
1
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.1.e7576
Wessel J, Marrero D (2017)
Genetic Testing for Type 2 Diabetes in High-Risk Children: the Case for Primordial Prevention
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e20695
Wetzel F, Hoffmann A, Häuser C, Vohland K (2016)
1st EU BON Stakeholder Roundtable (Brussels, Belgium): Biodiversity and Requirements for Policy
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8600
Wetzel F, Despot Belmonte K, Bingham H, Underwood E, Hoffmann A, Häuser C, Mikolajczyk P, Vohland K (2017)
4th European Biodiversity Observation Network (EU BON) Stakeholder Roundtable: Pathways to sustainability for EU BONs network of collaborators and technical infrastructure
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e11875
White E (2016)
Data Management Plan for Moore Investigator in Data Driven Discovery Grant
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10708
Wieczorek J, Bloom D, Guralnick R, Blum S, Döring M, Giovanni R, Robertson T, Vieglais D (2012)
Darwin Core: An Evolving Community-Developed Biodiversity Data Standard
.
PLoS ONE
7
(
1
). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029715
Wojnarski M, Hanken Kurtz D (2016)
Paperity Central: An Open Catalog of All Scholarly Literature
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
2
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8462
Woolfrey L (2017)
Data Management Plan: Opening access to economic data to prevent tobacco related diseases in Africa
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
3
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14837
Ziv G, Beckmann M, Bullock J, Cord A, Delzeit R, Domingo C, Dreßler G, Hagemann N, Masó J, Müller B, Neteler M, Sapundzhieva A, Stoev P, Stenning J, Trajković M, Václavík T (2020)
BESTMAP: behavioural, Ecological and Socio-economic Tools for Modelling Agricultural Policy
.
Research Ideas and Outcomes
6
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e52052

Supplementary materials