Related articles by
Guidelines
Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e12431
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12431 (28 Feb 2017)
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12431 (28 Feb 2017)
- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- FigsFigs
- TabsTabs
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
- NanopubsNanopubs
- Reviews2Reviews
Florian Wetzel
Citation:
Wetzel F (2017) Review of: Strategies and guidelines for scholarly publishing of biodiversity data. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e12431.
doi: 10.3897/rio.3.e12431.r43022
Review Form
Questions & Answers
Does the manuscript conform to the focus and scope of this journal? | Yes |
Does the manuscript contain unpublishable, for example fraudulent or pseudoscience, content? | No |
Do the title, abstract and keywords accurately reflect the contents and data? | Yes |
Is the manuscript written in grammatically and stylistically correct English? | Yes |
Does the manuscript contain sufficiently detailed information to merit publication? | Yes |
Are the methods relevant to the study and adequately described? | Yes |
Did the authors cite most of the literature pertinent to the subject? | Yes |
Are all relevant non-textual data and media (data sets, audio and video files, data from which graphs are produced) available as either supplementary files to the manuscript or through links to external repositories? | N/A |
In case data are deposited elsewhere, are they available openly, and do the links to these resolve correctly? | N/A |
Are the data consistent, properly recorded internally and described using applicable standards (e.g. in terms of file formats, file names, units and metadata)? | N/A |
Are the conclusions supported by the data? | Yes |
If applicable, are taxonomic and nomenclatural novelties compliant to the respective biological Code? | N/A |
Are the illustrations of sufficient quality? | Yes |
Are conflicts of interest, relevant permissions and other ethical issues addressed in an appropriate manner? | N/A |
Notes
The manuscript “Strategies and guidelines for scholarly publishing of biodiversity data” provides, in my view, highly relevant and very helpful information on how to provide open access to biodiversity data. Despite the increasing number of collected data, many of the datasets are not findable or available for research or lack the basic requirements for further scientific processing. The manuscript helps the reader to understand the current data publication landscape and gives helpful recommendations for how to publish the data, how to proper cite the datasets and how to handle licensing issues.
Particularly the best practice recommendations and section on how to publish different data types are a needed contribution for researchers. This is a valuable section as many researchers do not know about the possibilities and the paper outlines the options in a structured and condensed way. The suggestions of the review were properly integrated in the manuscript and additional links provided that give the reader some additional information.
Particularly the best practice recommendations and section on how to publish different data types are a needed contribution for researchers. This is a valuable section as many researchers do not know about the possibilities and the paper outlines the options in a structured and condensed way. The suggestions of the review were properly integrated in the manuscript and additional links provided that give the reader some additional information.
I've reviewed this manuscript and support its publication
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories