Related articles by
Research Article
Research Ideas and Outcomes 6: e56211
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e56211 (07 Jul 2020)
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e56211 (07 Jul 2020)
- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CiteCite
- MetricsMetrics
- CommentComment
- RelatedRelated
- FigsFigs
- TabsTabs
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
- NanopubsNanopubs
- ReviewsReviews
-
Article metadata
-
1. Introduction
-
1.1 Scope
-
1.2 Project Context
-
-
2. Transcription Cost Considerations
-
2.1 Information and workflow
-
2.1.1 Information and Data Standards
-
2.1.2 Workflow
-
-
2.2 Transcription interpretation
-
2.3 Staff experience level
-
2.4 Automation
-
2.5 Availability of cost data
-
-
3. Methodology
-
4. Case Studies
-
4.1 NHMUK Pinned Insects
-
4.1.1 Information and workflow
-
4.1.2 Project Results
-
4.1.3 Project Discussion
-
-
4.2 NHMUK Herbarium Sheets
-
4.2.1 Information and workflow
-
4.2.2 Results
-
4.2.3 Discussion
-
-
4.3 Luomus Pinned Insect and Herbarium Digitisation
-
4.3.1 Information and workflow
-
4.3.2 Results
-
4.3.3 Discussion
-
-
4.4 RBGK Leguminosae subtribe Phaseolinae, Dalbergia and Pterocarpus
-
4.4.1 Information and workflow
-
4.4.2 Results
-
4.4.3 Discussion
-
-
4.5 Meise Botanic Garden Google Cloud Vision API Trial
-
4.5.1 Information and workflow
-
4.5.2 Results
-
4.5.3 Discussion
-
-
4.6. Meise Botanic Garden first mass digitisation Project DOE!
-
4.6.1 Information and workflow
-
4.6.2 Results
-
4.6.3. Discussion
-
-
-
5. Discussion
-
5.1 Aggregate Results
-
5.2 Variables that have an impact on transcription times
-
5.2.1 Data depth and georeferencing
-
5.2.2 Workflow efficiency
-
5.2.3 Automation
-
5.2.4 Crowdsourcing
-
5.2.5 Training & Expertise
-
-
-
6. Conclusion
-
References
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories