|
Research Ideas and Outcomes :
Grant Proposal
|
|
Corresponding author: Tom Breeze (t.d.breeze@reading.ac.uk)
Received: 11 May 2026 | Published: 15 Jul 2026
© 2026 Tom Breeze, Riccardo Bommarco, Alexandra-Maria Klein, Ignasi Bartomeus, David Kleijn, Jochen Kantelhardt, Maximilian Koppenberg, Miranda Meuwissen, Henrik Smith, Carla Stoyanova, Mark Brady, Florence Damiens, Teodor Metodiev, Jelena Meinila, Joanna Tusznio, Carlos Ruiz Carreira, Henning Schaak, Sebastian Bekker, Jake Bishop, Shon Ferguson, Klara Fischer, Małgorzata Grodzińska-Jurczak, Hajnalka Szentgyörgyi, Helena Hansson, Romina Rader, René Van Der Wal, Richard Walters, Xiu-shan Li, Zhang Ying, Elena Carp, Simon Potts
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Breeze T, Bommarco R, Klein A-M, Bartomeus I, Kleijn D, Kantelhardt J, Koppenberg M, Meuwissen M, Smith HG, Stoyanova C, Brady M, Damiens F, Metodiev T, Meinila J, Tusznio J, Ruiz Carreira C, Schaak H, Bekker S, Bishop J, Ferguson S, Fischer K, Grodzińska-Jurczak M, Szentgyörgyi H, Hansson H, Rader R, Van Der Wal R, Walters R, Li X-shan, Ying Z, Carp E, Potts S (2026) VALues and dependence of society on pollinatORs (VALOR). Research Ideas and Outcomes 12: e199260. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.12.e199260
|
|
VALOR is a multi-actor project that will develop a comprehensive systems based approach to develop a deeper understanding of the cascading impacts of pollinator shifts from flower to fork (and beyond). Our work spans seven localised “focal regions” across Europe, where we will explore the impacts of pollinator shifts on ecosystems, farm businesses and local communities through primary research and modelling. These will be supported by broader synthesis and modelling tasks to determine the impacts of pollinators on value chains, international trade and nutrition and highlight the risks to ecosystems and natural capital across Europe, under different co-developed future scenarios. VALOR aims to empower actors to better understand their relationship with pollinators and will produce a number of co-developed tools for landowners businesses and policymakers to better understand these risks and easily undertake their own studies by replicating our methods and employing our models. Throughout the project, VALOR will work through our existing networks of policy and business collaborators to maximise the engagement with our outcomes, datasets and tools, build synergies with the wider pollinator research community and effectively mainstream pollinators into decision-making at all levels throughout Europe.
Socio-ecological systems, Pollinators, Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity, Farm business, Sociology, Value chain, Trade, Nutrition, Participatory research, Scenarios, Tools, Science Communication.
Animal pollinators have become a flagship for biodiversity conservation, largely due to their globally recognised role in supporting wider biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and human wellbeing (
Land-management is driven by a complex system of actors across policy, business and wider public realms, each of whom will influence the pressures on pollinators and benefit from pollination services in different ways. In particular, demand for animal-pollinated crops has led to significant intensification of production in many world regions (
VALOR brings together interdisciplinary researchers, NGOs and businesses, with the aim to co-develop and demonstrate a systems-based approach to understanding, measuring and responding to changes in the benefits that pollinators provide to society and the economy. VALOR bases its approach on the specific needs of seven focal regions, to build a better understanding of the flow of pollination benefits across actors and make our interdisciplinary methods, tools, databases and models visible and accessible. To achieve this, VALOR has seven specific objectives:
Ob1. Co-develop a better understanding of stakeholder knowledge needs around pollinators. Throughout its lifespan, VALOR will use discourse theory research, in-depth interviews and workshop activities to engage with both a dedicated stakeholder steering group of business and policy actors, and stakeholder communities within our focal regions to understand, identify, map and codify the ways in which different actors understand, are aware of, interact with, and value pollinators, and what information they require to support their decisions (WP1, WP4, WP7, WP8).
Ob2. Better understand the dependence of society and the economy on pollinators by quantifying the extent of direct and indirect benefits of all pollinating animals through both crop and non-crop plants. VALOR both i) synthesises existing data into new databases on pollination service benefits to crop and non-crop plants, key pollinating animals, and their main pressures and ii) conducts new empirical field research into the impacts of pollination on local farm business viability (use) and cultural (non-use) values. We will leverage these outcomes to enhance pollinator natural capital mapping at an EU level and evaluate the short- and long-term costs and benefits of mitigation actions to enhance decision support by local actors (WP2, WP4, WP3, WP5).
Ob3. Measure and model the cascading impacts of plant-pollinator networks on ecosystems and human wellbeing. VALOR will conduct in-depth field work to develop new models of plant-pollinator network functioning across a range of natural and human-modified ecosystems. This will not only fill key knowledge gaps in how these networks will respond to pollinator losses but allow us to develop state of the art models that can be used to quantify and map the risks from unmitigated pollinator loss and explore the cascading effects on the ecosystem and human wellbeing (WP3, WP4, WP5, WP6).
Ob4. Explore the consequences of pollinator loss through value chains by using rich multi-actor data to map the extent to which different actors within biomass value chains benefit from pollination services, and the consequences that unmitigated pollinator losses may have on economies and human nutrition and health, including sources of key micronutrients. Working directly with food, energy, material and medicinal value chain stakeholders, we build an understanding of risks for businesses and people, including their access to nutritious foods, across Europe and use this to develop suitable tools for mainstreaming pollinators into decision making (WP5, WP4, WP1, WP2, WP7).
Ob5. Forecast the resilience of pollinator networks and human benefits under future conditions. VALOR will co-develop a series of expansions of the widely used UN Shared Socio-Economic Pathway Scenarios to forecast the impacts of unmitigated changes on the resilience of pollinators, pollination services and pollinator-derived benefits for different actors. Combining modelling approaches and datasets developed across the project, we will evaluate the capacity of different beneficiaries to adapt to these changes and improve their understanding of the risks and explore the consequences of plausible responses by different actors (WP6, WP3, WP4, WP5).
Ob6. Co-develop knowledge and tools to engage and empower actors about pollinator conservation, with a variety of stakeholders from local to international scale. VALOR aims to make the full range of knowledge about pollinators as accessible and relevant as possible to the end users, including land managers, supply chain actors and businesses, and hosted on SafeHub - our existing “one-stop shop” for information/communication on pollinators. By synthesising our high-quality data and models, we will greatly improve the quality and discoverability of information around pollinators in business, farming and wider societal actors (WP7, WP1, WP2, WP5).
State of the art in relation to the call objectives
Quantifying the direct and indirect dependence of society and the economy on pollinators. Studies into the links between society and pollinators are typically limited in scope, with most focusing on illustrating the economic impacts of the total presence or absence of crop pollinators and their use values to farmers and farm-gate buyers (
Advancing monetary and non-monetary valuation of pollinators for accounting. Current systems of measuring the value of pollination services focus on the short term impacts and values associated with present benefits, rather than the value of long-term resilience within the system (
Developing tools for mainstreaming pollinator conservation into the food, health, energy, materials and land management sectors. Although ecosystem services have been linked with a number of economic benefits, there is still very limited mainstreaming of biodiversity within decision-making (
Better understanding and forecasting the risks of reversible and irreversible cascading effects in natural and modified ecosystems due to pollinator decline, and their impacts on human wellbeing through participatory scenarios. Many European pollinators are thought to be at risk of local and continental scale extinction (
Improving Technological Readiness
VALOR will lead the development of several new tools for decision-making. From discussions with members of our steering committee and researchers prior to submission, we have focused on the most easy to understand tools for supporting widespread decision making. Tools developed include: Web databases of pollinator dependences, key pollinators and pollinator vulnerabilities (WP2) (TRL7), web-based tools for assessing ecosystem vulnerability (Task 3.5), exploring narratives (Task 4.4) and assessing supply chain responses (Task 5.2) (TRL6), guidance books for incorporating metrics in business (Task 7.1) and replicating VALORs methods (Task 7.4), web-based risk assessment tools (Task 7.2) and a spatial planning tool for land managers (Task 7.3) (TRL5). All tools will be co-designed (Task 1.4) and tested by stakeholders (including steering committee, Task 8.5), supporting the lead partners of each task in raising them to TRL8 or, in the case of Task 7.2 and Task 7.4. TRL9.
Concept and overall methodology
Pollination is a key ecosystem process both for wider biodiversity and for the well-being of humans across the world (
VALOR will approach this challenge using an interdisciplinary and multi-actor systems-based approach that spans and binds the whole project. This approach is designed to capture the full chain of direct and indirect impacts of pollinator shifts, from flowers, to ecosystems, to crops, to farm businesses, to societies, to value chains and to human health and wellbeing. We will combine these approaches to
Systems-Based Approach
To ensure the depth of data collection without sacrificing the scale, VALOR will adopt a systems-based approach to understanding the importance of pollinators through a series of in-depth case studies in focal regions (Fig.
A fragmented vision of these questions would not suffice, as they are interdependent and form complex, multifaceted systems that require a holistic approach - Something that has not been attempted before.
Each of VALOR's focal regions (Fig.
| 1: Güímar Valley, Tenerife – Partner: ULL |
|---|
|
The Güímar Valley is a sparsely populated, highly agrarian area of Tenerife where most people are employed in smallholder tropical fruit farming. The region produces a number of high-value, highly pollinator-dependent crops, most notably avocado, which has expanded considerably in recent years, mangos and pitaya for global fruit markets, and moringa and aloe for medicinal markets. Besides agriculture, the valley includes rare Mediterranean scrub, as well as laurel forests and there are two Natura 2000 sites: Malpaís de Güímar (ES7020048) and Corona Forestal (ES7020054), as well as a regional protected area: Siete Lomas, which supports numerous endemic plants and pollinators, including several endangered species, and vertebrate pollinators such as birds and reptiles. Key challenge: VALOR will work with local farmers in the Coplaca cooperative and Canary Islands Avocado Growers Association (Asguacan) and Natura2000 site managers, building upon existing collaborations in the FRUTTMAC and POLINISLA projects, to address concerns about the long term resilience of farming to potential pollinator shifts, and the impact of competition for pollinators on wider biodiversity. |
| 2: Guadalquivir Productive Plains, Spain – Partner: CSIC |
|
The Guadalquivir productive plains is a diverse landscape, mixing protected habitats such as hyperdiverse Mediterranean shrublands and endangered dunar systems (including the Doñana National Park, a UNESCO World Heritage Site ref: 685bis) with conventional intensive production of berries (blueberry, strawberry), orange groves and olive orchards. These areas both depend on diverse and dynamic pollinator communities, including little-studied beetle floral visitors, which may be sensitive to disruption by activities elsewhere. This needs to balance the protection of pristine habitats, holding >300 bee species (including two species that are newly described from specimens in the area), and an intensive productive system immersed in a global trade of fruits, making this area an ideal scenario to evaluate the dependencies of pollinators from local to global scales. Key challenge: The team has extensive experience working in the natural areas of Doñana Natural Park, and has recently started to collaborate with local farmers to explore the effects of the managed bumblebee pollinators that are increasingly used in the area. This has led to concerns that these managed pollinators, which farmers feel are important to supporting productivity, may result in a distortion of plant-pollinator networks and the spreading of disease to local wild bees. Responding to the needs of these stakeholders, VALOR will bridge these existing collaborations to better understand the optimal balance and long-term impacts of managed pollinators. |
| 3: Baden-Württemberg Living Lab, Germany – Partner: UFR |
|
The Baden-Württemberg Living Lab is a community of 20 established (22 being established) demonstration farms, supported by the Ministry of Agriculture in Baden-Württemberg, Germany. These farms span a range of pasture, arable and perennial crops, including high-value crops such as apples, sunflowers, soy, and pumpkin, and include farms in the Bodanrück Natura 2000 area (FFH 8220-341). The Living Lab facilitates and studies the implementation of co-developed ecological farming measures to engage citizen science and develop toolkits. Key challenge: The EU-project RestPoll (led by UFR) is working with farmers in this living lab who have the most promising restoration measures for pollinators to assess the success of co-designed measures. A key practice among these farmers is the reduction of pesticides, including glyphosates, which is expected to have positive impacts on pollinators and pollination services. VALOR will expand this collaboration to explore the impact that these measures, combined with other practices, have on farm business performance (including opportunities for engaging with alternative markets) and the resilience of plant-pollinator networks to other pressures. |
| 4: Southern Małopolska Upland & the Vistula River Valley Living Lab, Poland – Partner: UJ |
|
Kraków is the capital of the Lesser Poland Voivodship and the second largest city in Poland. The Voivodship is the centre of Polish beekeeping, with as many as 13 colonies/km2. The city is located at the intersection of three major geographic regions and spans much of the Vistula River Valley, and is home to three N2000 areas. Among them, the Dębnicko-Tyniecki meadow complex (PLH120065) is the largest and most ecologically diverse area with wetlands and xerothermic grasslands, neighbouring the scientific-industrial complex of the Jagiellonian University’s Campus with a Living Lab on its grounds and the Ruczaj Business Park. North of the city is the Lesser Poland Upland, which has significant agricultural activity, covering 60% of the area and is vitally important to local society and economy. The region has a mix of arable and horticultural production, often on small farms (average size of 3.8ha), including high-value fruits such as apples and cherries, and oilseeds. Key challenge: Recent studies revealed diverse bee communities both inside the city limits and on the Upland. However, there are concerns about the impacts that agricultural practices and beehive density may have on the stability of pollination services within these ecosystems, and in turn, how different management between urban and rural areas may affect resources for beekeeping. VALOR will work with the UJ Campus Living Lab, growers associated with Maspex (a member of the steering committee), and local beekeepers to build an understanding of these dynamics across these two sites. |
| 5: South-Limburg, Geuldal Valley Living Lab, Netherlands – Partner: WU |
|
South-Limburg is a densely populated area in the extreme south of the Netherlands. Intensive agriculture makes up approximately 60% of the land-use; the remaining area is split between built-up areas and nature, while tourism represents the main pillar of the regional economy. Agriculture consists of a combination of arable farming, dairy farming and horticulture (pear, apple, cherry, etc.). The area contains a relatively high proportion of Natura 2000 areas with threatened habitat types such as calcareous grasslands (H6210) and Oak-Hornbeam forests (H9160). Key challenge: Stakeholders in the area want to reconcile intensive farming practices with the maintenance of nearby nutrient-poor habitat types. VALOR will build upon the Living Lab Boshommellandschap Geuldal that targets wild bee conservation at the landscape level and the farmer network that has been built around it within the H2020 SHOWCASE project on integrating biodiversity in farming systems. |
| 6: Kent apple Orchard Living Lab, UK – Partner: UREAD |
|
Kent is the main fruit-producing area of the United Kingdom, producing most of the UK's apples, plums and pears in small but intensive orchards, mostly for domestic markets. There is little unaltered habitat, but hedgerows and other small linear habitat features are common, which provide undisturbed soil and diverse plant communities to support diverse ground-nesting solitary and eusocial bees. Previous research demonstrated significant deficits in yield and quality, driven by inadequate pollination. This prompted a community of stakeholders, including growers, conservation groups (Wildlife Trusts), marketing boards (Avalon), processors (Innocent drinks) and retailers (Waitrose) to collaborate on wild pollinator restoration in orchards in a Living Lab. Key challenge: Stakeholders are interested in understanding the potential long-term effects of these interventions on pollination service security and wider value chains. VALOR will engage with these stakeholders, many of whom are long-term collaborators, through their Living Lab (also engaged in the RestPoll project) activities. |
| 7: South Scania, Sweden – Partner: ULUND |
|
The county of Scania in southern Sweden is dominated by agriculture, containing landscapes that range from intensively farmed simplified arable landscapes dominated by cereals to heterogeneous landscapes with mixed farming including animal husbandry. The county provides habitat for 75% of Swedish wild bee species, out of which 20% are threatened. Scania contains a range of pollinated crops, where crop market value are highest foroilseed rape, apples and strawberries, but field beans are an emerging crop. Previous research has identified trait-related dependencies of pollinator communities on landscape simplification and pesticide use. Key challenges: Two ongoing, large-scale projects (e.g. RestPoll and PollinERA), focus on restoration of sandsteppe habitats for threatened bees as well as benefiting pollinators in the wider agricultural landscape through creating a series of targeted flower strips, coordinated by the rural extension service, and reducing or mitigating pollinator pesticide risk. VALOR will address the interests of stakeholders (inc. the Swedish Board of Agriculture & Rural Economy and Agricultural Society in Scania), in the interactions between these two efforts on plant-pollinator network resilience, crop pollination services and social goods from the landscape. |
Two regions (#1, #6) are outside of the mainland EU, affecting their interactions with value chains, and five regions are engaged through multi-actor Living Labs undertaking habitat restoration activities around pollinators (#3, #4, #5, #6, #7). Although all partners will collect similar data with standardised protocols on plant pollinator interactions (T3.1, T3.2), landscape structure (T3.3), farm business activity (T4.2) and social values (T4.4), the approaches of the tasks are flexible to allow variation to suit local conditions and address the specific key challenges in each region. A dedicated task, led by practitioners, will ensure continual engagement with focal region stakeholders throughout the project and facilitate learning between partners (T1.5).
Many of the values of pollinators are likely to depend on local contexts, in these and other regions across Europe. As such, in addition to high quality research, VALOR has been designed to make data and models available and accessible to a wider audience, both through specific decision support tools (T7.1, T7.2, T7.3), but also through accessible guidance on our methods (T7.4, T7.5) to empower researchers, policymakers, businesses and other stakeholders to undertake their own studies and iterate upon our methods. By lowering the barriers of entry for non- specialist actors, our approach aims to support mainstreaming of pollinators in decision-making and encourage cooperation between actors across systems, borders and disciplines.
VALOR is built around stakeholder engagement at both the regional level through our focal regions and the international level through our steering committee – a group of end users who have helped develop and refine the project from the outset and who are committing in-kind or subcontracted time to the project. VALOR will continue to engage with these actors throughout the project (WP1) while conducting high-quality quantitative and qualitative research over four empirical work packages (WP2, WP3, WP4, WP5). The information synthesised from this will then be used to explore the resilience of pollinators and pollination service benefits under future scenarios (WP6) and develop a series of suitable tools for engaging actors with pollinator management (WP7) (Fig.
WP1: Multi-Actor engagement and co-development (Lead: SLU, Co-lead: UREAD)
Work Package 1 is an overarching set of tasks that underpin the other work packages and facilitate the integration of focal region and international stakeholders into the multi-actor process. WP1 will build on stakeholder mapping conducted under related projects (e.g., Safeguard, PoshBee) to conduct discourse analysis with key EU actors to understand the role of pollinators and knowledge about pollinators in policy formation and governance (Tasks 1.1 and 1.2). Building from this, we will engage our steering committee and other stakeholders from within and beyond our focal regions in a series of workshops and interviews to
Finally, throughout the project, this work package will have a regular forum for partners to meet and gather input and feedback from stakeholders within the focal regions and beyond, to allow for the joint construction of demonstration case studies (Task 1.5). The work package will produce a series of user-facing reports, written in non-technical language that will serve as a backbone for WP6 and WP7, and provide a template for future stakeholder co-development activities around biodiversity and ecosystem services (Table
| Organisation name | Type | Country |
|---|---|---|
| Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development | National Policy (Economy and Biodiversity) | Croatia |
| Birdlife Europe | NGO (Biodiversity conservation) | EU |
| Cargill | Business (Agrifood, Energy, Fodder, Materials) | USA (global) |
| Maspex | Business (Processed foods) | Poland |
| Pangaia | Business (Sustainable fashion) | United Kingdom |
| Bakker | Business (Fresh fruits and vegetables) | Netherlands |
| ABP Food | Business (Meat) | United Kingdom |
| Arla | Business (Dairy) | Denmark |
WP2: Synthesising knowledge on the role and status of pollination services (Lead: UFR, Co-lead: UNE & ULUND)
Work Package 2 will comprehensively synthesise knowledge on the key animal pollinators and pollination service benefits from pollinated plants through a series of in-depth data syntheses. First, Task 2.1 will update and extend the seminal work of Klein et al (2007), which defined the dependence of globally important crops with fifteen years of updated primary literature. This will allow us to produce a definitive, open-access database of animal pollination influences on yield, quality, nutrition and, ultimately, economic output of cultivated crops within and beyond Europe. Task 2.2 will, for the first time, bring together and catalogue the evidence for cultural values of pollinators and their indirect role in supporting other ecosystem services such as soil quality (via legumes such as clovers) or erosion control through pollinated plants. Task 2.3 will integrate existing datasets from published sources (e.g.
WP3: Pollinator Dependencies of Natural Ecosystems (Lead: CSIC, Co-lead: WU)
Work Package 3 combines high-quality ecological field research and modelling to extend our knowledge of the roles of pollinators in maintaining interconnected natural and human-modified ecosystems and the cascading impacts that disruptions to plant-pollinator networks will have on ecosystem service provision. In each focal area, the work package will undertake highly detailed field ecological research to explore the responses of key wild plants in each focal region to variations in pollination services (Task 3.1), and assess plant-pollinator and food web network mapping to understand the role of pollinators in maintaining functional and stable ecological networks at the landscape level (Task 3.2). These data, alongside data collected from open datasets and other current and past research projects (e.g., Horizon 2020 Safeguard and Horizon Europe RestPoll) will be used to: improve upon widely used process based modelling of pollinator populations within the wider landscape (Task 3.3), model the impacts of known pressures on the persistence of plant-pollinator interaction networks across habitats (Task 3.4) and spatially model the vulnerability of European ecosystems, including culturally significant landscapes, to pollinator losses (Task 3.5). The tasks in this work package will address significant knowledge gaps in understanding of the functional role of pollinators in wider interconnected ecosystems, identify key pollinator assemblages, and produce crucial ecological models that can directly inform other work within the project and directly address stakeholder needs, such as providing information on local habitat vulnerabilities or informing EU Nature Restoration strategies.
WP4: Local scale economic and social dependences (Lead: BOKU, Co-Lead: UJ)
VALOR Work Package 4 will use methods from multiple disciplines to extend our understanding of the use and non- use benefits of pollination services at a local scale, from simple abstract measures of monetary benefits to fields, to more meaningful measures of farm business profitability and local cultural values. Our work will combine quantitative agronomic modelling to address long-standing questions about the relationships between pollinator visitation and crop yield reactive to other inputs (Task 4.1) with detailed surveys of typical farm business activity, integrating these into field and activity-based models of farm profitability (Task 4.2). This information will then be combined with farm-scale multi-input production function models (Task 4.3) to upscale these outputs and assess the relative resilience of farms to pollination service shifts in the short and long term across landscapes. These economic tasks will be complemented with discourse-focused workshops and interviews, looking into co-develop an understanding of the direct and indirect cultural values of stakeholders that engage with the landscapes in the focal regions (Task 4.4). The outcomes of these tasks will be extended to assess the costs and benefits of co-designed land use and farm business re-orientations to respond to pollination service losses (Task 4.5). This work package will produce novel and realistic measures of the economic and non-economic values associated with pollinators, and explore how they contrast across our focal regions, as well as provide novel research into the resilience of different actors to pollination service shifts.
WP5: Dependences of value chain actors (Lead: WU, Co-Lead: UH)
Work Package 5 will expand the knowledge of the economic and nutritional impacts of animal pollinators on actors throughout wider value chains through new primary data and modelling along a chain of actors. The work package will span food, feed, material, energy and medicinal crops, beginning with those within our focal regions but also including major global commodity crops (e.g., coffee, palm, soy) that are key for these sectors in Europe. We will begin with an exploration of the structure of the value chains, through collaboration with our stakeholder steering committee members, and the consequent (perceived) economic impacts of pollinator losses on the actors within these chains (Task 5.1). We will then explore costs and impacts of strategies for different actors within these value chains to build resilience to pollinator losses through quantitative economic modelling and interviews with our steering committee (Task 5.2). In parallel, VALOR will also examine the impacts of global pollinator shocks on the volume and value of crop trade through established global trade models to identify countries where pollinator shocks could pose a significant risk to European agrifood systems (Task 5.3). Finally, throughout the project, we will conduct a comprehensive analysis of the impacts that pollinator loss - if unmitigated - will have upon the affordability and availability of nutritious foods to different people across Europe and the environmental impact this may have, using publicly available dietary and environmental impact databases (Task 5.4). The outcomes of this work package will directly link pollinators to human health, push the boundaries of economic research into biodiversity loss on food system resilience, and substantially expand our outreach and tool development activities by providing value chain case studies that are relevant to a wider range of business, policy and public health actors.
WP6: Forecasting and enhancing resilience of society and pollinators under changing future conditions (Lead: ULUND, co-lead: SLU)
Work Package 6 will combine ecological-economic modelling with scenario narratives to analyse the multidimensional impacts of different mechanisms, particularly policy instruments, that actors can employ to reduce and reverse the pressures on pollinators (including climate change) and the effects this has on their resilience to pollinator shifts. The work in WP6 is underpinned by the expanded UNSSP scenarios co-developed with stakeholders (WP1) and supplemented with information on the relative impacts of pressures and drivers on pollinators from other WPs and the EU Ecosystem Assessment (
WP7: Co-developed tools for expanded engagement and interaction (Lead: PENSOFT, Co-lead: UNEP-WCMC)
A key component of VALOR’s ambition is to substantially improve the availability, accessibility and accuracy of resources for assessing the pollination-related dependencies and impacts of policy, the public and businesses of all sizes and sectors to relevant actors. Work Package 7 will undertake this through a series of new or expanded tools, co-developed through engagement with WP1, that is designed to directly address the needs of different actors at the scale of regions, the EU, and globally. Task 7.1 will synthesise the results of the project to identify appropriate metrics and guidelines for incorporating pollinators into business and policy decisions (e.g., Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) accounting frameworks). In Task 7.2, we will integrate our findings into an existing, widely used decision support tool for financial institutions, businesses, and policymakers at all levels (ENCORE), alongside other linked tools as appropriate, that will greatly improve the details of risks and advice on mitigation that are provided to end users. Task 7.3 will build a new tool for farmers, land managers and NGOs to examine the spatial impacts of landscape decisions on pollinators, building on the existing INCA maps of pollinator natural capital. Task 7.4 will collect the different methods and models developed within the project and refine them into an accessible handbook that will allow interested users from across sectors, with little expertise in pollinators, to generate the data necessary for the models we will make freely available from the project, allowing them to conduct their own custom-made case studies. Finally, Task 7.5 will collect key information from throughout the project and make it available through an expansion of the Safeguard project’s SafeHub online portal, illustrating our approach with a series of public-facing case studies from our focal regions. The outputs of this work package will form the core of our dissemination activities and VALOR’s lasting legacy outside of the research community.
WP8: Project Management and Impact (Lead: UREAD, co-lead: PENSOFT)
Work Package 8 will focus on the coordination of the project and its dissemination and engagement activities. The project will be coordinated by UREAD, who are experienced with international collaborations and previous EU research projects. The work package will maintain the coordination between VALOR and the other project funded through the call, as well as other related research projects (e.g., RestPoll, SHOWCASE) and other international research organisations (e.g., FAO, IPBES, IPCC). The work package will be supported by PENSOFT, who are very experienced in project branding, outreach and dissemination and will coordinate the wider outreach activities of the project. Task 8.1 will establish the project coordination standard operating procedures, which will include the gender action plan and three quality assurance mechanisms to support effective collaboration with focal region stakeholders, and delivery and exploitation of the key outcomes. Task 8.2 will develop a recognisable project visual identity, including a variety of promotional materials and a dedicated website. Task 8.3 will develop and implement a Data Management following FAIR data principles for the collection, storage, evaluation and exploitation of the data that will be collected during and after the project. Task 8.4 will develop a detailed PEDR that will guide all communication and dissemination activities of the project and support the successful exploitation of VALOR outcomes. Task 8.5 will ensure the ongoing communication & dissemination of project findings to relevant end users, throughout and beyond VALOR’s duration. Task 8.6 will identify and plan collaboration pathways with existing projects, networks, programmes and initiatives pollinators, agricultural sustainability and food systems.
WP9: Research ethics (Lead: UREAD)
Work Package 9 will ensure compliance with research ethics and GDPR regulations. We will manage this through developing a set of guidelines early in the project that will support the consistent collection of data from human subjects and the lethal trapping of wild insects under FAIR principles (Task 9.1). This will be managed by UREAD with the support of an independent ethics advisor who will report to the EU on a regular basis.
Multi-actor approach
VALOR is a fundamentally multi-actor project, developed by a collaboration of Universities, public research institutions (CSIC), NGOs (ELO, UNEP-WCMC, which works in collaboration with the UN Environment Programme) and science communication experts (PENSOFT), all of whom will have a leading role in multiple tasks, and the VALOR steering committee, a group of policy makers, NGOs and businesses from multiple sectors who have committed in kind time and data access in order to directly co-develop tasks in the project, from data to outputs (notably Task 3.2, Task 5.1) and will act as early adopters of our findings. Our project has been co-designed through over 20 open meetings, workshops and individual one-to-one consultations with end users, including international research, businesses and policy actors, and trusted local collaborators (focal region stakeholders). These focal region stakeholders (Fig.
VALOR has specific tasks (WP1, T8.1, T8.6) to drive and expand our multi-actor and co-development activities that draw upon, and feed into, the other WPs. We will work with these actors throughout the project to
Summary of Multi-actor co-development and participatory research activities. Bold text indicates codevelopment. SC = Steering committee, FRS = Focal region stakeholders, IS = International stakeholders.
| WP | Co-development and participation activities | SC | FRS | IS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Exploring focal region key challenges (T1.5), Co-designing & participating in workshops & interviews, (T1.3, T1.4), policy interviews & discourse (T1.1, T1.2) | X | X | X |
| 2 | Co-designing natural capital workflows (T2.5) | X | X | |
| 3 | Co-develop selections of key local plants (T3.1), habitats (T3.2.) and areas (T3.3) | X | ||
| 4 | Selecting key crops and supplying farm business data (T4.2, T4.3), participating in workshops and surveys (T4.4), co-developing management solutions (T4.5) | X | X | |
| 5 | Identifying key value chain actors and supplying data (T5.1), co-developing value chain solutions (T5.2) | X | X | X |
| 6 | Refining scenario modelling for the focal areas (T6.2), feedback on resilience models (T6.3) and policy solutions (T6.4) | X | X | X |
| 7 | Co-developing and testing tools and demonstration case studies (all tasks) | X | X | X |
| 8 | Participating in the development and dissemination of outreach materials (T8.5) and providing regular feedback on project findings (T8.1) | X |
VALOR partners have coordinated or led work packages in several key research projects into pressures on pollinators (e.g, PoshBee, WildPosh, PollinERA), pollinator management and restoration (RestPoll, SHOWCASE), sustainable farming (LIFT, FRUTTMAC), supply chain resilience (SURE-Farm, BATmodel), health and wellbeing (FoodSEqual, NNR2023) and tools for facilitating management change (D4AgEcol, Esmerelda). The consortium has also been heavily involved in the IPBES Assessment of Pollinators, Pollination and Food Production, the EU Red Lists of Bees and Hoverflies, the EU Pollinator Monitoring Scheme, the UNEP National Ecosystem Assessment Programme and the EU Biodiversity Working Group on Pollinators. Not only will VALOR benefit from the existing engagement and outcomes of these projects (Table
| Project | Objectives and links with VALOR |
| Pollinator & biodiversity-focused projects: VALOR will explore the social and economic impacts of pressures and restoration measures studied in these projects | |
|
RestPoll(Horizon Europe, ongoing) UFR, UREAD, ULUND, WU |
RestPoll is exploring pollinator restoration through an interdisciplinary Living Labs approach. VALOR will extend the work in several of these living labs to better understand the wider ecological, economic and societal impacts of these restorations across landscapes, value chains and policy (WP1, WP4, WP5). |
|
Safeguard*(Horizon 2020, ongoing) UREAD, WU, ULUND, SLU, CSIC, ELO, PENSOFT *The Safeguard project has finished by the time of this publication. |
Safeguard is exploring the status, trends and importance of pollinators across Europe using a DPSIR framework. VALOR will utilise the participatory research (WP1), expand the modelling and database of pressures on pollinators to real-world interconnected ecosystems (WP2), and the SafeHub web tool(WP7). |
|
SHOWCASE (Horizon 2020, ongoing) WU, CSIC, UREAD, SLU, BOKU, PENSOFT |
Showcase bridges knowledge between the incentives of agricultural producers and biodiversity management practices for sustainable development. VALOR will expand upon the project's multi-actor community to explore the impacts that management can have on farm business performance and resilience (WP4, WP6). |
|
PoshBee(Horizon 2020, completed) UREAD, UFR SLU, PENSOFT WildPosh(Horizon Europe, ongoing) UREAD, UFR, PENSOFT PollinERA (Horizon Europe, ongoing) ULUND, UJ, SLU, PENSOFT |
PoshBee examined the effect of multiple chemical and biological stressors on managed and wild pollinators. WildPosh will significantly improve this project’s evaluation of the risk of pesticide exposure of wild pollinators. PollinERA aims to reduce the harmful impacts of pesticides through developing knowledge and protocols for a broad range of toxicological testing. VALOR will draw upon the published and emerging results of these projects (e.g. the stakeholder mapping and key field results from PoshBee) to better understand the drivers of pressures on pollinators and their impacts on plant-pollinator networks (WP3, WP6). |
| Sustainable farming, health and value chain projects: VALOR expands the research of these projects to explicitly include pollinators as a risk to different sectors | |
|
TRANSECO (Swedish research council FORMAS, 2023-2026) SLU |
TRANSCO engages actors from farm to fork in developing and implementing agroecological practices, indicators and market solutions for sustainable cropping. VALOR builds upon the project's work on farm economics, food value chains (WP5), and will disseminate results through the platform (WP8). |
|
SURE-Farm (Horizon 2020, completed) WU, SLU |
SURE-Farm designed and assessed pathways for European farming systems(including mutually dependent value chain partners) to become more sustainable and resilient. VALOR will build on these pathways in our work value chain strategies (WP5), scenarios (WP6) and governance solutions (WP1). |
|
LIFT (Horizon 2020, completed) BOKU, SLU |
LIFT studied how socio-economic and policy drivers affect the development of ecological approaches to farming and assess their performance and sustainability across systems and scales. VALOR expands upon this research to explore the specific impacts of pollinator shifts on farm performance (WP4, WP6). |
|
D4AgEcol(Horizon Europe, ongoing) BOKU |
D4AgEcol provides knowledge for the transition to agroecological farming byidentifying suitable digital tools and technologies.VALOR will work the projectto develop and disseminate our digital tools for pollinator management (WP7). |
|
NNR2023(Nordic Council of Ministers, Completed) UH |
The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations (NNR) 2023 update project incorporated environmental sustainability alongside the health implications of nutrition in Nordic countries. VALOR builds on insights gained through this process as the basis of our assessment of pollinator declines on nutrition, health and sustainability (WP5). |
| Science-policy and science-business projects: VALOR will develop pollinator-focused forecasts and insights into policy decision formation to support operationalising the outcomes of these projects | |
|
IPBES Pollinator Assessment (UN, completed) UREAD, UJ, SLU, UFR |
The IPBES thematic assessment on pollinators, pollination and food was a comprehensive synthesis of pollinator research used to inform global policymaking. VALOR addresses the key knowledge gaps around the links between pollination services and human wellbeing (WP1, WP3, WP4, WP5). |
| EUPoMS & STING(European Commission, ongoing) UREAD, CSIC, ULUND | EUPoMS is a European Commission funded programme of research (inc. theSPRING and STING projects) to develop a Europe-wide pollinator monitoring scheme. VALOR will identify workflows to link the data generated from this to models of pollinator natural capital and other indicators (WP2, WP7). |
|
EU Biodiversity Working Group on Pollinators(EUWGP, EC & MS) UREAD |
EU WGP aims to assist EC, DG ENV and MS in the preparation of policy initiatives related to pollinators, and facilitate the exchange of good practices(WP1, WP7). |
|
BioAgora(Horizon Europe, ongoing) WU, PENSOFT, UNEP-WCMC |
BioAgora aims to connect research results on biodiversity to the needs of decision-making in a targeted dialogue between scientists, other knowledgeholders and policy actors. Results from VALOR will be fed into the science-policy interface developed by BioAgora. |
|
ESMERALDA(Horizon 2020, completed) PENSOFT |
ESMERLDA conducted mapping of the state of ecosystem services across Europe. VALOR will build upon the “Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services” process in developing our pollinator land management mapping tools (WP1, WP7). |
|
TRANSPATH(Horizon Europe, ongoing) PENSOFT |
TRANSPATH will look at trade and finance, their regulations, and how these affect biodiversity and pathways. VALOR builds upon the project's work to identify leverage points and interventions for triggering transformative changes at consumer, producer and organisational levels (WP1, WP5, WP6). |
VALOR has a specific task that will drive these collaborations (T8.6), which we envisage will take three forms: building on the legacies of past projects through the use of datasets, models and approaches. Synergies with existing projects, where VALOR focal region data, models and data products can increase the impacts of the projects and lead to joint publications. Finally, direct collaboration where VALOR will share field sites and directly use emerging data, models and outcomes from the projects to produce joint publications, impact materials and deliverables (Fig.
Finally, VALOR will also work with one Australian and two Chinese associate partners, who will contribute datasets (WP2) and key connections in the value chain (WP5, WP6) and in policy (WP1). These partners will leverage this collaboration to actively develop additional research that can deepen our work by adopting VALOR's approaches outside the EU. VALOR will also actively encourage collaboration with other projects as they emerge and support collaborators within our wider network in replicating our approaches or contributing data to our deliverables.
Finally, VALOR will also work with one Australian and two Chinese associate partners, who will contribute datasets (WP2) and key connections in the value chain (WP5, WP6) and in policy (WP1). These partners will leverage this collaboration to actively develop additional research that can deepen our work by adopting VALOR's approaches outside the EU. VALOR will also actively encourage collaboration with other projects as they emerge and support collaborators within our wider network in replicating our approaches or contributing data to our deliverables.
VALOR will adhere to the EU Guidelines on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Research Data. Data management policies will be developed in Task 8.3, with a deliverable on this task in Month 6, and an update in Month 42. We will generate observational ecological data from field work in the focal regions (Tenerife, Spain, Germany, Poland, Netherlands, UK, Sweden), stored as MS Excel files. We will generate text data and audio/video recordings from interviews with policymakers and value chain actors from across the EU (and in select tasks from China) and from focal region stakeholders, workshops, farmers and wider public. These will be transcribed and rendered pseudonymous before processing and publication. These activities will be subject to GDPR and local data protection law complicit ethical approval by the task lead and stored on password protected drives at by the task lead. No participants will be identifiable from the processed data. Any data that cannot be fully rendered pseudonymously will remain confidential. All other data will be generated from the synthesis of existing databases (e.g., Eurostat, INSPIRE) or literature. Model outputs will include rasterised maps of regions. The project is expected to generate ~1TB of data, mostly from maps. Upon publication, all non-confidential data and codes will be stored in FAIR online repositories (e.g., Dryad or Zendoo), with associated DOI assignment and published under open licences. UREAD and PENSOFT will assume responsibility for data management and curation. Most data will also be available via Safe-Hub for added visibility, accessibility and engagement. There are no plans for commercial exploitation of the data, although some open-licensed data will be used to generate commercial data products (ENCORE). Metadata will follow Darwin Core and Ecological Metadata Language, both standards for ecological data, and vocabularies that align with ontologies offered by INSPIRE and other open data centres. All publications will be made openly available via gold open access or suitable repositories immediately upon publication, and all partners have open access fee waiver agreements with several major publishers. Tools will be freely available via Safe-Hub and ENCORE, and, where appropriate, codes will be published on GitHub and archived in Zendoo.
VALOR is a fully interdisciplinary project with significant prominence and resources attached to both natural (WP2, WP3, WP4) and social (WP1, WP4, WP5) sciences. VALORs systems based approach spans a complete link from primary pollinator ecology and taxonomy (WP2, WP3), to agronomy (WP4), farm business economics (WP4), quantitative and qualitative social sciences (WP1, WP4), value chain and macroeconomics (WP5) and health, nutrition and life cycle modelling (WP5). All partners include either a mix of social and natural science researchers or experienced interdisciplinary researchers (including the project co-ordinator). Work Package 6 in particular is designed to support the complete integration of these different disciplines towards a single research question. Our multi-actor approach, engaging with both our steering committee and focal region stakeholders, is supported by dedicated policy (SLU, ELO, UNEP-WCMC) and business (UREAD, UNEP-WCMC) researchers.
The VALOR consortium recognises the importance of gender and gender identity in shaping research, particularly stakeholder-facing research. Failure to account for these dimensions, particularly where cultural gender norms may play a role in land management activities, can lead to biased research data and ineffective engagement activities. We will build a dedicated gender equality and diversity plan that builds upon and learns from the lessons from similar plans in other projects (e.g., RestPoll, WildPosh) and is embedded in our multi-actor approach. This will recognise the importance of intersectionality, and include dedicated attention to and reporting of gender dimensions when recruiting participants and engaging with focal region stakeholders. The project's Focal Region Management group (Task 1.5) will maintain information on the rate of engagement with female and minority gender identity actors and participants, and work with partners who are experiencing difficulties in recruiting diverse participants, and the internal review process will be used to raise issues with gender biases in data collected. All participant institutions have gender equality plans and will be expected to attend diversity and inclusion training offered by their institutions before hiring in order to promote sensitivity to these issues. Recruitment of postdoctoral researchers and PhD students will also aspire towards gender balance in the overall consortium, and female and non-binary researchers will be supported to attend training and development work, and hybrid options will be mandatory for all in-person meetings. The VALOR consortium also recognises that these issues are intersectional and will actively engage with initiatives to support researchers of minority ethnic groups, the LGBT+ community, disabilities and those who are neurodivergent. The coordinating institution, UREAD, has a number of commitments to promoting equality, including a UK Athena Swan Silver award for promoting gender equality, a race equality charter Bronze award for commitments to supporting racial diversity and is a member of the employers' network for equality and inclusion and the Business Disabilities forum.
Projects for topics under the destination HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-01 should set out a credible pathway resulting in the strategic plan having the following impact: "Biodiversity is back on a path to recovery, and ecosystems and their services are preserved and sustainably restored on land, inland water and at sea through improved knowledge and innovation". More specifically, one or more of the following impacts should materialise:
Expected Impact 1: Direct drivers of biodiversity decline will be understood and showcased
Although many stakeholders are broadly aware of the links between pollinators and society, they know much less about how their actions are likely to contribute to pressures on pollinators or how to respond to this, either individually or in collaboration with other actors. This is most pronounced in value chain actors who may source inputs from distant regions. By taking a systems-based approach, VALOR will greatly improve understanding of the links between socio-economic and political drivers of change and pressures on pollinators (e.g., habitat loss, climate change) over time (T1.1, T1.3, T6.1, T6.2). Through targeted field work (T3.2), new (T2.3, T2.4) and existing datasets (e.g., CropPol -
Expected Impact 2: Protected areas and their networks will be planned, managed and expanded, and the status of species and habitats will be improved based on up-to-date knowledge and solutions.
Protected areas, including Natura 2000 sites, are important for pollinators, but the pollinators within them are also crucial for the maintenance of the wider biodiversity within them that depends on pollination. However, stakeholders often lack information on which pollinator species contribute the most to maintaining the plant communities within these protected areas, limiting their ability to develop comprehensive responses. VALOR addresses this by synthesising existing data to identify the key pollinators of European wild plants (T2.4) and the pressures particular to the understudied island regions outside of mainland Europe (T2.3), and generating new data and models to quantify the resilience of plant communities to pollinator losses (T3.1, T3.2). These are then combined into maps of plant-pollinator network risks across Europe with a specific emphasis on protected areas (T3.5), producing a risk score for all EU protected areas. These outputs can be used as the basis of targeted action plans and restoration actions under the Habitats Directive. Beyond these ecological factors, VALOR’s research into the cultural importance of pollinators and pollinated plants across different regions and countries, which emphasises protected areas and rare habitats (T2.2, T4.4), will give rise to public-facing dissemination materials that can help protected area managers generate public engagement in their activities (T8.5). By making these outputs openly accessible as part of VALORs expansion of the upcoming SafeHub web-portal (T7.5), linking with the outcomes of other projects (T8.6), and producing tailored dissemination materials for the focal regions (T8.5), including a spatial planning tool (T7.3), VALOR will enhance the ability of managers and policy makers to suitably manage protected areas for the benefit of pollinators and wider biodiversity. We will measure impact through engagement with the testing and, at the end of the project, use of our spatial planning tools, downloads of our handbook and references to these outcomes in management plans by protected areas and national governments. Towards the end of the project, we will reach out to managers of the most at-risk protected areas (identified in T3.5) to engage them with our findings and promote our methodologies (T7.4) as part of their management, as part of the project’s wider legacy.
Expected Impact 3: Biodiversity, ecosystem services and natural capital will be mainstreamed in the society and economy
Stakeholders are increasingly aware of the monetary impacts of pollinators on crop production, but other types of value associated with pollinators are largely unknown, and the metrics of economic value are often abstract and pertain only to crop pollination. VALOR has been designed through multi-actor engagement to both acknowledge these multiple value types and to generate output metrics that are compatible with current performance indicators and the needs of different stakeholders, in different contexts, and with different objectives. To this end our work considers overall profitability, not just yield and quality (T4.2, T4.3, T4.5, T6.4), the direct monetary impacts of pollinator shifts to businesses within value chains (T5.1), national-scale trade value metrics relevant to macroeconomic planning (T5.3), disability-adjusted life years and other metrics used in national health statistics (T5.4), environmental footprints (T5.4), and measures of the relative risk of pollinator losses on culturally significant natural ecosystems (T3.5, T4.4). These measures, along with key metrics of pollinator dependence (T2.1, T2.2), pressures (T2.3, T6.1) and responses, will be used to 1) improve publicly available natural capital accounts (T2.5), which currently lack details about risks, resilience and non-crop values and are not validated against real data, and 2) develop business and policy facing guidance e.g. ESG accounting (T7.1) and risk assessment (T7.2). We build on these to produce targeted dissemination activities (T8.5) and tools (T7.3) that are informed by our user needs (T1.4) and policy decision-making analyses (T1.1, T1.2) and will co-develop demonstration case studies to highlight these metrics in a user-facing context (T1.5, T7.5). Increased consideration of pollinators in private and public operations will support progress towards UN SGDs 12 (responsible consumption and production), 13 (climate action) and 15 (life on land). We will measure this impact through the number of downloads, citations and uses of our valuation outputs and other metrics, methods, databases and dissemination materials by policy (e.g. in national biodiversity strategies), businesses (e.g. incorporation into science-based targets) and practice (e.g. consultancies or researchers adopting our methods). Throughout the project, we will collaborate directly with policy and business to mainstream the understanding, tools and indicators arising from the project into business activities and major policies such as the Common Agricultural Policy, national implementation of the EU Nature Restoration Law, the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and future relevant policies.
Expected Impact 4: Practices in agriculture, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture will be developed and improved to support and make sustainable the use of biodiversity and a wide range of ecosystem services.
Practices to support pollinators require stakeholders to make long-term commitments to management activities (e.g. establishing habitats or transitioning to low-input systems), but the long-term consequences and contextual effectiveness of these measures in supporting pollinators and pollination are largely unknown, deterring participation by both land managers and policymakers. By developing a better understanding of the consequences of pollinator shifts on plant-pollinator networks (T3.3, T3.4, T3.5), VALOR will develop a stronger scientific understanding of the management needed to support pollinators. Building on this, we will provide new information on the impacts that current and potential measures (T2.5) have on different actors (T4.4, T4.5, T5.2) and, using narrative scenarios co- developed with stakeholders (T1.3), examine the optimal responses of stakeholders in alternative futures (T6.4). These outcomes will be communicated directly to stakeholders in our focal regions, but also synthesised into policy briefs and presented in policy webinars for wider dissemination (T8.5), and co-developed advice (T1.4) for the ENCORE business risk tool (T7.2) and as part of our land management planning tool (T7.3), empowering stakeholders to make long-term management and policy decisions towards their preferred future. Our impact will be measured through total downloads and citations of our dissemination materials, and the number of evidence-based practices available to land-owners and value chain actors that contribute to (pollinator) biodiversity. Throughout the project, we will collaborate with stakeholders (T1.4) to develop strategies to promote and mainstream our tools and knowledge hub (T7.5) among practitioners as “go-to” sources for decision support, evaluating their success through regular engagement as part of project dissemination and communication activities (T8.4, T8.5).
Expected impact 5: Biodiversity research and support policies and processes will be interconnected at EU and global levels, making use of advanced digital technologies and societal engagement where appropriate.
A major barrier in the effective implementation of biodiversity policy has been the disconnect between different policy areas (e.g., agriculture, environment, food, trade, and climate), creating conflicting messages and advice for stakeholders. VALOR addresses this challenge through consistent engagement with stakeholders and policymakers to understand how policy has been formed (T1.1) and how information affects their decision-making (T1.2). By considering the whole system across seven contrasting focal regions, VALOR will generate evidence that is relevant to policy at different scales (T3.3, T3.5, T4.2, T4.3, T5.1), including global trade (T5.3) and the impacts of different sectors as drivers of pressures on pollinators (T6.1). From this, we will use co-developed narrative scenarios (T1.3) to produce insights into the resilience of activities pursued by different actors to pollinator losses over time and the possible responses they may make, including reducing dependence upon pollinators (T6.3, T6.4). We will work directly with JRC, DG-Env, and EEA to identify workflows that utilise existing EUPoMS and Eurostat datasets to connect pollinator data with other relevant data to enhance JRC INCA natural capital accounting (T2.5). Collectively, these actions and tools will facilitate mainstreaming pollinators in policy outside of environment and agriculture, enhance their effectiveness at supporting biodiversity and towards sustainable industry and society. Impact will be measured through the number of national and international policy documents outside of environment and agriculture that draw upon our findings at a member state, regional and international level, the total level of engagement with our webinars, briefs and enquiries from policy actors outside of our focal regions via our associated partners.
Expected Impact 6: The biodiversity and health nexus will be understood, in particular at the level of ecosystems. This will be achieved by using the one-health approach, in the context of climate change and globalisation and by addressing contributions and trade-offs.
Within and beyond our focal regions, stakeholders recognise that pollinators are part of a wider web of life that is itself essential to supporting human wellbeing, but do not often actively consider these cascading links. VALORs systems based approach aligns with the One-Health to directly connect shifts in pollinator communities (T2.3, T3.2, T3.4) to plant communities (T2.2, T3.1), wider fauna (e.g., birds), and ultimately on human physical and mental wellbeing through engagement with nature (T2.2, T4.4) and access to healthy, affordable and nutritious food through global value chains (T2.1, T5.1, T5.3, T5.4). Linking these relationships with the risks posed by global drivers of pressure on pollinators, including climate change, trade and policy (T1.1, T5.4, T6.1), we will identify at-risk areas (T3.5, T6.3), demonstrate the consequences of unmitigated losses on health and wellbeing (T5.4) and produce interactive demonstration case studies (T4.4, T7.5) and dissemination materials (T8.5) targeting educators, health and heritage organisations, land managers, and conservation NGOs to raise awareness of the role of pollinators to human health and mainstream them into the health policy and planning. VALOR will work with EFSA, FAO and other policy organisations to integrate pollinator conservation into wider wellbeing and sustainable food systems (e.g. EU Farm-to-Fork strategy) policies and through this promote a one-health approach to understanding the impacts of current food, farming and trade systems on human wellbeing. This supports progress towards UN SDG 2 (no hunger). The number of times VALOR output is being used or cited in human health or food security documentation, policy and research will indicate our impact, although this can be expected to mostly occur after project life-time.
Strategic communication, dissemination, and exploitation (CDE) activities are a key stepping stone in VALOR’s pathway to impact. They will be consolidated in a Plan for the Exploitation and Dissemination of Results, including a communication plan (PEDR, M6). The strategy will be updated regularly (M20, M38) to provide a finer level of granularity, reflect stakeholder feedback and optimise the planned actions based on a performance co-evaluation with stakeholders. The PEDR’s main components are:
| Level | Sub-level | Representatives |
|---|---|---|
| Academia (A) | Relevant ecological, economic & social research networks | Researcher networks: IPBES, EUPoMS, Safeguard, SHOWCASE, RestPoll, PoshBee, EuropaBON, SureFarm, LIFT, BATmodel, UK GFS and Treescapes programmes, RestPoll living lab networks. Living databases: Mangal.io, GloBI, CropPol, GBIF |
| Policy (P) | EU-level policy makers | EU: DG AGRI, DG ENV, DG SANTE, EEA, DG RIA, DG RTD, JRC, EFSA. International: UNEP, CBD, IPCC, IPBES. National: MS Ministries of Environment and Agriculture; National Park managers. |
| Business and Industry (I) | Businesses and cooperatives; Industry representative bodies | Cargill, APB Foods, Maspex, Bakker, Pangaia, Arla, Innocent drinks, Copa-Cogeca, ECVC, National Farmer and Beekeeping Associations, EIT Food Network, Linking Environment and Farming (LEAF) |
| Citizen Science and Society (S) | Environmental, Food, farming, cultural and biodiversity NGOs | IUCN, Pollinis, Butterfly Conservation Europe, Promote Pollinators, BeeLife, Birdlife, International National Trusts Organization, Gardenizer Plus |
Dissemination channels, target groups and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). A= Academia, P = Policy, I = Business and Industry, S = Citizen Science and Society.
| Channel | Target group | Key performance indicators |
|---|---|---|
| VALOR website | A, P, I, S | No. visits >15,000/project duration, Average session duration >120s, Returning visitors >30%; Distribution: EU & beyond, links with EU Pollinator Information Hive. |
| Safe-Hub webpage | A, P, I, S | Link with EU Pollinator Information Hive, inclduing regular updates, No. visits >5,000/project duration. |
| Social media networks(Bluesky, LinkedIn, YouTube) | A, P, I, S | Posts >1/week; reposts (Bluesky/LinkedIn) >1/week; followers/ subscribers & “likes” >+50/year; impressions on Bluesky and other microblogging >100 000/project duration. |
| Project introductory video | S | Promotion of video through EU Pollinator Information Hive and others, ≥200 views / video. |
| Coordinated press releases | A, P, I, S | ≥5 press releases issued during the project; Downloads/visits > 1500/press release |
| Electronic newsletter | A, P, I, S | Subscribers + 25/year; No. opens >45% |
| Focal region visits | I, S | One open activity per year (e.g., bioblitz, talks, workshops, farm walk) within each of the focal regions by their respective partners. |
| Stakeholder summaries for policy and practice | P, I, S | ≥20 stakeholder summaries, disseminated though partners, project network and steering committee members, that 1) highlight key messages from publications and 2) summarise our findings into the key challenges for each focal region. (>50 downloads each) |
| Policy briefs and webinars | P | At least 5 EU science-policy briefs (incluing two joint with BUTTERFLY) produced and tailored for specific EU policymakers and accompanied with target webinars organised in collaborationwith relevant policy actors. Webinars should average 50 per event. |
| Practice abstracts | P | Produce at least three practice abstracts targeted at value chain actors, farmers and environmental organisations, disseminated though the focal region stakeholders, ELO and wider networks (>100 downloads each). |
| Presentations at scientific events and conferences | A | Presentations at ~12 international or national conferences to present the results of milestones and deliverables and highlight impacts. |
| Scientific publications | A | ≥25 Open Access Scientific publications promoted though externalblogs and other global press. |
| Pollinator and pollination datasets | A, P, I | Database infographics and other accessible promotional materials produced and disseminated through partners, steering committee members and wider networks, >500 downloads/database (at least 6 datasets will be produced) |
| Key Exploitable Result | End-users | Main novelty / uniquevalue proposition | Dissemination/Exploitation routes |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Report on Pollinators in UNShared Socio-economic Pathway narratives [WP1] Type: Report Scale: EU |
Policy, Research | The UN SSP (Shared Socioeconomic Pathway)narratives are popular but not suited for assessing changes to pollinators | Direct dissemination of the report to EU policymakers via EU-level policy (e.g., JRC). Academic publication |
|
Report on user needs for tools to mainstream pollination services [WP1] Type: Report Scale: EU |
Policy, Research | Outlines the needs of stakeholders across different sectors for tools and technologies to integrate pollinators, including those not developed by VALOR | Direct dissemination of the report to EU Businesses via the EU Biodiversity & Business platform and other partners |
|
Databases of pollinator dependence, key pollinatorsand their pressures [WP2] Type: Data set Scale: Global |
Policy, Business, Research | The database will be an invaluable tool for pollinator research and valuation by policy and research | Hosted on the SafeHub website and held in open-access repositories. Tailored EU/national level fact sheets, distributed via JRC |
|
Role of pollinators to society - a gap analysis [WP2] Type: Report Scale: EU |
Researchers | The role of pollinators outside of crop production is understudied. A gap analysis is necessary to outline future research needs | Report disseminated to the EU and national research funding agencies. Open access academic publication in a review-focused journal |
|
Report on opportunities to Valorize EU datasets for improved pollinator natural capital accounts [WP2] Type: Report Scale: EU |
Policy, Business, Research | Pollinator natural capital accounts do not capture risks, resilience or non-use values and are not validated against real data | Report and academic paper. Policy brief & webinar, disseminated via ELO and policy partners (e.g., JRC, Eurostat) to member state representatives |
|
Spatially-explicit dataset on plant-pollinator interactions across different EU regions [WP3] Type: Dataset Scale: EU |
Researchers | Several initiatives, such as GlobI, depend on hard-to-obtain data such as plant-pollinator interactions | Released as a DataSet in Zenodo, and fed into the GlobI database. We will collaborate with JRC/EEA to identify uses for the database eg. State of Nature Report |
|
Extended process-based Poll4Pop model to predict pollinator abundance and diversity [WP3] Type: Code Scale: Global |
Researchers | Current models do not account for floral resource limitation or ‘hunger gaps’ in the season, limiting their application in spatial landscape planning | Academic publication, accessible user materials, code hosted on Safe-Hub and GIThub (etc.). Distributed to national agencies via e.g. Biodiversa+ |
| A web-based tool ranking the vulnerability of ecosystems and pollinators based on their mutual dependences [WP3]Type: ToolScale: EU | Policy, Research | This will provide a much sought-after tool foridentifying sensitive ecosystems, particularlywithin networks of protected areas | The tool will be part of the Safe-Hub website and promoted to national governments and NGOs through collaboration with Biodiversa+ network, EEA, eLTER etc. |
|
Report on social and cultural capital from pollinators [WP4] Type: Report Scale: EU |
Policy, Research | There are no systematic studies on the risks to local cultural capital of pollinator loss and the potential strategies to address this | Public report distributed to e.g. ELO and Birdlife Europe members, heritage and cultural organisations. Academic publication. Accessible materials for focal region stakeholders |
|
Costs of land management measures responding topollinator declines [WP4] Type: Report Scale: EU |
Policy, Land managers | Many actions have been developed by practitioners and researchers to respond to pollinator decline, but their viability as a business option is unknown | Direct dissemination of the report to focal region stakeholders, ELO members and EU policymakers via e.g. DG-Agri. Academic publication. Policy webinar |
|
Optimisation model to analyse trade-offs between costs and pollination performance [WP5] Type: Tool Scale: Global |
Business, Policy, Research | First tool to assess trade-offs of pollination-related strategies along various types of value chains | The tool will be available as supplementary material, hosted on SafeHub alongside the open-access publication. Dissemination materials for the EIT Food network |
|
Manuscript on impacts of pollinator decline on nutrition and health of European populations [WP5] Type: Report Scale: EU |
Policy, Researchers | No previous studies have modelled the impacts of pollinator decline on nutrition & health in Europe using nationally representative dietary intake data | Academic publications and accessible dissemination materials developed for public health authorities. Open access database on DRYAD and Safe-Hub |
|
National Index of pollinator risk based on societal factors [WP6] Type: Data set Scale: National, EU |
Policy, Researchers | Novel use of societal factors to predict pollinator risk | Online index on Safe-Hub. Academic publications, accessible dissemination materials. Distribution to EU members via JRC or EEA |
|
Empirically calibrated ecological-economic model for scenario modelling and policy analysis [WP6] Type: Software Scale: EU |
Researchers, Land managers, Businesses, Consultants | Models to project the effects of drivers of change from scenarios on land use and pollinators are not openly available | Academic publications, accessible dissemination materials, open access model hosted on e.g. GITHub |
|
Policy recommendations to mitigate pollinator declines [WP6] Type: Report Scale: EU, National |
Policy, Researchers | A synthesis of the key pathways to building resilience of pollinator communities to pressures and of actors to pollinator declines | Policy briefs & webinars targeted to EU and national policymakers and businesses, disseminated through e.g. EIT food. Academic publications |
|
A spatial mapping tool to support farmer decision making around pollinators[WP7] Type: Software Scale: EU |
Land managers | Current spatial mapping of pollinator values lacks the interactivity and detailed costs and benefit assessment to support farm decision-making | The tool will be hosted on Safe-Hub and publicised through farmer networks, however collaboration with JRC to fully integrate into INCA will be sought |
|
Augmented Pollinator module in the ENCORE Tool [WP7] Type: Tool Scale: Global |
Policy, Business, Research | ENCORE is one of the most popular tools for assessing biodiversity risks, but current information on pollinators is very coarse | Insights feeding into the tool will reach its rapidly growing user base. Accompanied by a UNDP-WCMC communication piece |
|
Guidelines for business-focused pollinator metrics [WP7] Type: Guideline report Scale: EU, Global |
Businesses, Consultants | Existing guidance on science-based targets and corporate ESG accounting does not account for the specific risks and impacts on pollinators | Business-facing publication by UREADs Henley Business School, UNDP-WCMC, and other stakeholders distributed to their existing networks |
|
The VALOR handbook of methods [WP7] Type: Tool Scale: Global |
Researchers, Consultants, Policy, Land managers, Public, Students |
There is a need among policy, business andresearch for a single, plain-language guidebook for evaluating the values of pollinators | The handbook will be hosted on SafeHub and disseminated through ELO, UNDP-WCMC and wider research networks. We will also seek hosting by JRC & EEA |
|
VALOR Demonstration case studies [WP7] Type: Demonstration Scale: Global |
Researchers, Consultants, Policy, Farmers, Public | Demonstrating our approach through relatable narratives will increase engagement with the methods and outcomes of VALOR | Hosted on SafeHub and disseminated through focal region stakeholders, partner media channels and one or more EU policy platforms |
|
VALOR Policy Briefs and Webinars [WP8] Type: Demonstration Scale: EU, Global |
Policy, Businesses | Pollinators are increasingly mainstreamed across policy, and there is considerable demand for updated data | Policy briefs will be targeted at national and EU governments through, e.g. EU Pollinator Working Group events and BioAgora |
|
VALOR End of Project Conference [WP8] Type: Demonstration Scale: EU |
Researchers, Business | The collected outputs of VALOR will be important to stimulate further research into biodiversity and ecosystem services | Conference co-hosted with related projects and suitable international societies. Attendance will be recorded to assess engagement |
|
VALOR Legacy booklet [WP8] Type: Dissemination material Scale: EU, Global |
Research, Policy, Business, General public | The final VALOR outputs from each WP, together with all graphical abstracts, will be showcased in a professionally designed booklet | The Legacy booklet will be centrally featured on the project website, uploaded on the Safe-Hub and printed and disseminated at relevant onsite events |
As the broadest of the CDE activities, communication efforts in VALOR will start from the beginning of the project and will continue beyond its lifetime, working towards the positive societal impact of the project, i.e to expand the understanding of the role of pollinators in European Society and the Economy to foster their consideration in decision-making. To communicate its activities and results, VALOR will employ a variety of materials, formats and channels tailored to the needs of each specific target group (see Table
Innovative communication formats such as podcasts or video series will be used to increase societal awareness of the importance of pollinators. The project will also distribute a bi-annual e-newsletter, which will inform stakeholders about the latest project news and progress, facilitating links and engagement with actors beyond the project itself. VALOR will also approach established contacts in a variety of large media, newsrooms and message outlets, such as partners’ newsletters and blogs, e.g. EurekAlert!, AlphaGalileo, ScienceDaily, etc. The project will embrace a mutual learning approach, encouraging partners to use their personal and institutional social media channels, as well as to reach out and seek potential knowledge exchange with organisations, networks and projects: Biodiversa+, BioAgora, EIT Food, IPBES, IPCC, GEO BON, EuropaBON, One Earth, GBIF, Safeguard, TRANSECO, MISTRA Food Futures, BATModel, SHOWCASE, RestPoll, FoodSEqual, WildPosh, PollinERA, SPRING, STING, TRANSPATH.
VALOR’s dissemination efforts will aim to make its results as easily available as possible to potential users, contributing to the project’s scientific and economic/technological impact. The project will tailor various uni- and bi-directional channels to the needs of its stakeholder groups, eliciting their expertise, knowledge, and perceptions as part of the project’s core activities. The project’s social media channels (BlueSky/Facebook and LinkedIn as a start) will be operational from the very beginning, engaging relevant stakeholders in the project’s activities, while also disseminating results as soon as they become available in order to maximise their uptake. Regular updates will also be shared via VALOR’s website, which will serve as a central dissemination tool, storing project outputs such as deliverables and publications, as well as providing access to project events, policy briefs, promotional materials, etc. These will also be conveyed to DG-Environment for hosting on the EU Pollinator Information Hive. Moreover, VALOR materials will be incorporated into SafeHub. Developed under H2020 Safeguard, this knowledge exchange hub will be a “one-stop shop” for data, information and toolkits from Safeguard and other relevant pollinator projects.
The stakeholder community will further benefit from tutorial videos on the project’s tools and model usage. The possibility to open a project collection in an open-access journal will be considered in order to guarantee broader reach of the results, long-term accessibility, as well as provide access to less traditional research outputs such as public deliverables, reports, policy briefs, etc. In the end, the project will have a comprehensive collection of all results as re-usable, openly accessible, citable publications and datasets, hence ensuring VALOR outputs will remain available beyond the project’s lifetime. VALOR will rely on the substantial networking potential of its consortium members, who will help engage stakeholders in joint activities through their key roles in ongoing or completed European research projects and initiatives (see Table
VALOR’s exploitation efforts will focus on making concrete use of project results for societal and policy support purposes (see Table
Management of knowledge generated will follow terms developed under the Consortium Agreement, based on the principles that:
For an overview of the key elements of the impact section, please see Table
| SPECIFIC NEEDS |
|
VALOR was created in response to the needs for:
|
| EXPECTED RESULTS |
|
VALOR is expected to produce:
|
| D & E & C MEASURES |
In order to deliver the expected results, VALOR will:
|
| TARGET GROUPS |
|
VALOR's main outcomes will benefit a range of stakeholders in Europe and globally:
|
| OUTCOMES |
|
Following successful D, C & E activities, VALOR will lead to:
|
| IMPACTS |
|
VALOR's legacy will be to:
|
VALOR consists of eight interlinked and themed work packages spanning engagement (WP1), syntheses (WP2), ecosystems (WP3), local actors (WP4), value chains (WP5), future scenarios (WP6), tools (WP7) and coordination (WP8). Each WP has a lead and co-lead who will take overall responsibility for its coordination and delivery (Fig.
VALOR is a fully interdisciplinary and multi-actor project that has been built from the ground up to engage with a wide range of audiences both within and outside of academic research. The systems-based approach adopted by the project requires a range of high-quality ecological, economic and social science data to be collected across all seven focal regions in a coordinated manner, early in the project. As such, VALOR's consortium has been deliberately limited to a few, well-funded partners with interdisciplinary expertise, to ensure that adequate resources are available for all relevant tasks in each focal region, with other partners bringing world-leading expertise to other key tasks. This approach allows us to maximise the quality and consistency of data collection and the breadth of stakeholder networks. The consortium members will conduct mutual training and development activities as part of the project's regular meeting cycle, in order to support cross-disciplinary skill development, particularly of early-career researchers. Female researchers are participating from 12 (86%) of the partners, and span a range of career stages from early and mid-career researchers to well-established research leaders. VALOR also has geographic balance across Northern (31%), Western (25%), Eastern (13%) and Southern Europe (13%), one of which (ULL) is based in an EU Overseas territory, as well as three third-country associated partners (18%). In addition to Universities, VALOR's consortium includes government (CSIC), commercial (PENSOFT), and practitioner (ELO) and NGO (UNEP-WCMC) partners, and the steering committee consists of businesses (ABP Foods, Arla, Bakker, Cargill, Maspex, Pangaia), non-government (Birdlife Europe) and policy (MINGOR) organisations that have contributed significant input to the project. The inputs of these non-academic partners and steering committee members have been key to developing VALOR's tools (WP7) and communication (WP8) tasks by providing a range of perspectives on what users may need from the project’s main outcomes and the kinds of barriers to adoption we are likely to encounter. This will ensure that these activities, and the research that underpins them, are developed in a manner that reflects the needs of different end users in a lasting and effective way. The partners are also members of several international, industry-facing networks such as the EIT Food network (UREAD, CSIC), Capitals Coalition (UNEP-WCMC) and UN One Planet Network (WU), who will be approached to support the dissemination of our key results to wider communities. The tasks to be undertaken in the focal regions have been formulated to reflect the varied circumstances and local stakeholder needs in each region and provide a diversity of ecological, economic, and cultural contexts. This plurality of perspectives will be used to shape our outputs, especially the tools and scenarios, in order to maximise the relevance and engagement with actors across Europe.
UREAD will act as the overall coordinator and will include a dedicated project administrator to support management activities (WP8). They bring leading expertise in agronomy (T4.1), business engagement (T7.1), science-policy engagement (T8.5), as well as a strong interdisciplinary team who will manage the UK focal region. The SLU team bring leading expertise on both larger-scale economics (T4.3, T5.3, T6.3), will lead on the policy and engagement activities (WP1), where they have built considerable expertise from the Horizon 2020 Safeguard project. UFR will bring expertise and datasets on key crop and non-crop pollination services and take overall leadership of WP2, and adding direct links with the Horizon Europe project RestPoll, which they coordinate. UJ brings expertise in environmental sociology and will lead on the social science data collection and synthesis tasks (T2.2, T4.4), as well as experience in the multiple drivers of pollinator declines(T3.5). CSIC brings significant modelling expertise and datasets on plant-pollinator networks (T3.2, T3.4) and will take overall leadership of WP3, and will contribute to social and economic tasks (WP4). WU brings world-leading expertise on both farm value chains and resilience (assuming leadership of WP5) and on pollinator management in intensive landscapes (T3.1, T3.5) and will bring direct links to the Horizon 2020 SURE-Farm and Showcase projects. ULUND are leading experts in the development of spatially explicit models for both pollinators (T3.3) and land management decision making (T6.2, T6.4) and have substantial experience working on wider food webs (T3.2) and with policy, business and other stakeholders. ULL will contribute experience in the unique ecology of pollinators in island biogeographical regions (T2.3) and the activity-based farming systems found in smallholder systems (T4.2, T4.5). BOKU are leading researchers in agro-economic farming research, particularly from the perspectives of performance and resilience, and will lead the overall implementation of WP4. UH brings pioneering expertise in the interlinkages and impacts of environmental shifts on diet and environmental sustainability and will lead T5.4, one of the most complex tasks in VALOR. PENSOFT are leading science communications experts with a strong track record of engagement in pollinator-related projects (e.g., PoshBee, Safeguard, WildPosh, PollinERA). They will drive VALOR's communication, dissemination (WP8) and tool development activities (WP7), including integration of tools in the SafeHub online knowledge hub, to create a lasting legacy for the project across a wide range of audiences. UNEP-WCMC operates in collaboration with the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) at the UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC). All outputs of UNEP-WCMC are delivered under the collaboration arrangements between UNEP-WCMC and UNEP, and are therefore subject to approval by UNEP. UNEP-WCMC brings specialist expertise in science-business and science-policy engagement, which they will leverage to lead our stakeholder needs assessment (T1.4) and incorporate VALOR's outputs into their world-leading decision support tool ENCORE (T7.2). ELO is an international federation of land owners who work with members to foster engagement between science, policy and practice. They will support the collaboration with focal region stakeholders and provide continuous access to their user base for wider stakeholder recruitment and tool testing throughout the project's lifespan.
VALOR also includes in-kind contributions from several substantial national and international businesses (Cargill, Maspex, Pangaia, Bakker, ABP Foods, Arla) as part of our stakeholder steering committee who will bring both primary data for value chain case studies (WP5) and their professional expertise into user needs for our tool and scenario development (WP1), participate in scenarios (WP6) and tool testing (WP7) and, where appropriate, dissemination activities (WP8). Each of these partners brings unique insights into different markets, scales and demands. ABP Food works with a network of over 45,000 farmers, specialising in beef and lamb products and are pushing to be world leaders in traceable, fair and sustainable meat products. Arla is a co-operative of owner farmers spanning seven countries across Europe that specialises in dairy products and has a focus on forward-thinking, sustainable management. Bakker is one of the largest fruit and vegetable companies in the Netherlands, servicing the global market with fresh, freeze-dried and prepared fruits, vegetables and flowers. Cargill are a US-based global commodity trading corporation with interests across the world in crops such as palm, soy, sunflower and cotton. Situated at the heart of the supply chain, Cargill are actively working to reduce the environmental impacts of their activities through initiatives such as zero deforestation. Maspex are one of the largest food-producing groups in Central and Eastern Europe, and includes many internationally recognised brands of fruit drinks and preserves. Pangaia is a material science company dedicated to developing novel, sustainable clothes and other material products with a fair and transparent business model. Each of these businesses is dedicated to improved sustainability and proactive engagement with biodiversity management throughout their supply chains and will help refine VALOR’s approaches from concept to impact. VALOR is also supported by Pensoft Publishers, who have over a decade of EU-level science-communication experience and a particular expertise around biodiversity and pollinators. They will assume co-leadership of WP7 and WP8, but also host much of VALOR's outputs through open repositories. ELO are an organisation at the heart of European land management and will provide key linkages from VALOR to the wider land owner community.
VALOR is fortunate to engage with three third-country partners who will each contribute to key tasks within the project on an in-kind basis. UNE will contribute existing datasets to the synthesis work, developing datasets for pollination services. They will also pursue opportunities to source Australian funding to apply VALOR's systems-based approach in Australia, and contribute to the dissemination activities of the project. BFU will contribute to the value chain (WP5) and policy work (WP1), providing key insights from one of the EU’s largest trading partners, and CWNU will support data gathering and quality control from Chinese-language research literature in WP2. UNE and CWNU researchers have participated in the IPBES pollinator assessment, and all have strong local business and policy links.
CWNU and BFU will also apply for funding from the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology under the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology’s collaborative funding programme of ~4m Yuan RMB, to support a Chinese co-operation project (VALOR in China). If VALOR in China is funded, CWNU will establish four Chinese focal regions (Gansu, Sichuan and Shanxi provinces) and contribute to WP3 (T3.1, T3.2, T3.3) and WP4 (T4.1, T4.2, T4.4) and WP1 (T1.5) following VALORs multi-actor approach, and BFU will expand their contribution to WP5 through deeper analyses of four important value chains for the Chinese export market (Sunflower in Inner Mongolia, honey in Sichuan, apple in Shandong and medicinal plants in Gansu: T5.1 and T5.2) and conduct scenario modelling in WP6 (T6.2, T6.4). Both will participate with user needs testing and translation for the VALOR handbook of methods (T7.4), provide Chinese Demonstration Case studies for SafeHub (T7.5) and collaborate on dissemination materials (T8.5). The proposal will include support for bilateral meetings between Chinese partners and other members of the consortium, and the coordinator will be an associate partner on this proposal, having existing collaborations with CWNU. VALOR in China will be developed through a multi-actor partnership of local businesses to provide complete policy recommendations and decision support for central and provincial governments, and a range of local actors, building on many existing connections between these Universities and stakeholders.
VALOR receives funding from the European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 101181169. Views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Research Executive Agency (REA). Neither the EU nor REA can be held responsible for them.
University of Reading
Copy of Ethical self-assessment (updated)
The VALOR consortium recognises the need to account for ethical considerations within the project. This particularly applies to the collection of data from human subjects in Task 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 2.2, 4.2, 4.4, 4.5, 5.1, 5.2. and 5.4).
The project will also appoint an independent ethics officer by (or before) M1 (Milestone 9.1). The main role of the Ethics Advisor is to provide guidance and facilitate the beneficiaries to ensure that all ethical issues related to activities in the grant are addressed in compliance with national, EU and international ethical principles. Following the recommendation of the Ethics Summary Report, the Ethics Advisor will specifically indicate how to make sure that data subjects can be well protected in their fundamental rights and freedoms.
In addition to the guidelines stated as part of D9.1, the project co-ordinator is part of an ethical approval board and is familiar with the requirements of GDPR and will provide additional support to partners, should they encounter difficulty in ensuring their data collection tools are complicit with this approach. All partners involved in data collection (UREAD, UFR, UJ, WU, ULL, CSIC and ULUND) also have named data protection officers who can support each partner on an ad hoc basis as the need arises. The Consortium confirms that compliance with ethical principles and applicable international, EU and national law in the implementation of research activities not originally envisaged (or not described in detail) in the DoA will be ensured.
The Consortium also confirms that any ethical concerns raised by those activities will be handled by rigorously following the recommendations provided in the European Commission Ethics Self-Assessment Guidelines.
Humans and Personal data: For each task (1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4., 2.2, 4.2, 4.4, 4.5, 5.1, 5.2. and 5.4.), leading partners will be expected to be responsible for the ethical collection of primary data and seek institutional approval in a manner complicit with GDPR, in particular with regards to the storage and processing of data that has not been fully anonymized and the collection and handling of sensitive data. This will include:
Third countries: VALOR has several partners and associate partners from the UK, Australia and China. UK partners (UREAD and UNEP-WCMC) will collect and store personal data in line with UK data protection laws, which are complicit with EU GDPR rules, making adjustments as necessary to ensure continued compliance should the UK legal framework change. None of the proposed activities are expected to have any particular ethical issues associated with them. No associate partner will be expected to conduct data collection on human subjects, no personal data is expected to be transmitted to these countries, and no materials will be imported from/exported to these countries. All data transmitted to third countries must be anonymised or pseudonymised as appropriate, and this will be reviewed as part of D9.2. Travel to non-EU countries is only envisaged to take place for project meetings for which partners will be required to comply with their institutional arrangements regarding travel.
Animals and Environment Health and Safety: Other ethical issues relate to the collection of insects via lethal trapping methods (Tasks 3.1 and 3.2). This is an unavoidable part of the identification of many species of bees and hoverflies, as many can only be distinguished through features that are only visible through microscopes. Such sampling will be kept to an absolute minimum to avoid pressures on local populations of rarer species. All partners engaged in field work are familiar with the taxonomy of common bee species and can provide training to local researchers taking part in data collection. It is not possible to say how many specimens are likely to be collected, as populations of insects fluctuate significantly across space and time. No vertebrate pollinators are expected to be subject to any physical sampling; observational data will suffice. All partner institutions have internal health and safety procedures for the collection that comply with the relevant EI guidelines (use of cellular phones, formally notifying authorities of activities, reporting of health and safety, etc.). However, the project will also outline a set of standard guidelines for the ethical collection of data in relevant tasks (D3.1, D3.2) as part of the project's ethical guidelines (D9.1). This will include the following:
Figure 2 has been redesigned in accordance with the project branding in Month 4 (April 2025).
This chart has been updated to align with the milestone numbering in the Grant Agreement.