The retention of molecules inside a reactor, or an analytical system, is described as immobilization, whose purpose is to improve protein stability, selectivity, and particularly for the enzymes, increase catalytic activity (Tomotani et al. 2005). Aside from enzymes, other protein types can be immobilized, for example peptide domains for protein purification or immobilization such as: albumin binding domain (ABD), avidin (AvBD) and immunoglobulin G (ImGBD) (Luisi et al. 2013).

Enzymes are widely used in our society, and their applications range from industrial processes - such as in food production, biofuels and tissue - to more complex therapeutic applications, such as biopharmaceuticals (e.g., asparaginase use for acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment (Pieters et al. 2010).

A medical application that benefits from enzyme immobilization is biosensor development (Sassolas et al. 2012). These devices display additional advantages such as reliability, speed, ease of handling and low cost compared to traditional diagnostic methods (Khan and Alzohairy 2010). Immobilized therapeutic enzymes are also being exploited due to their stability and reusability which enhance the targeting of specific tissues and cells (Bosio et al. 2015).

Enzybiotics comprise a class of enzymes with antibiotic activity. These enzymes are able to fight resistant bacteria, such as MRSA, VRSA and VISA (Rashel et al. 2007), antibiotic resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus, which is a serious and recurring problem in hospitals. Enzybiotics refers mainly to the antibacterial potential of bacteriophage lytic enzymes endowed with the capacity to degrade bacterial cell wall (Rashel et al. 2007​). This set of enzymes exhibits potential application on burn wounds otherwise susceptible to opportunistic colonization by microorganisms (Merabishvili et al. 2009). Thus, an artificial skin graft with antimicrobial properties may present a therapeutic option. Furthermore, an immobilized enzyme may not easily penetrate the skin and would thereby exhibit low or no allergenicity (Sheldon and van Pelt 2013). Considering this application and the different materials used as support matrix, enzybiotic functionalized spider silk proteins become an attractive alternative.

The polymer constituting the spider silk bears interesting properties for various applications, including immobilization of molecules such as proteins. Spider silk is known mainly for its tensile strength and fracture resistance, but also exhibits elasticity, adhesion, biocompatibility and low degradation. Its strength can be compared to Kevlar synthetic polymer, which is composed of aramid and is used in for manufacturing body armor (Lewis 2006).

It is known that certain repetitive sequences of amino acids confer specific properties to these structures and proteins in tissue, allowing one to obtain materials with desired characteristics through genetic manipulation of these structural domains. The poly-alanine domains (poly(A/GA) (Glycine-Alanine) in MaSp1 proteins, MaSp2 and MISP are associated with formation of beta-sheets and the production of strong fibers, while repeating sequences "GPGGx" and "GGX" as in Flag protein, preferably generates an elastic beta-spiral region, which provides elasticity (Tokareva et al. 2014).

In addition, terminal domains (N-terminal NT and C-terminal CT) are highly conserved both among species and different types of silk (Garb et al. 2010), which suggests they play important roles in the formation of silk and not in the generation of its mechanical properties per se. The change in CO₂ and proton concentrations controlled by the glandular duct ensures that polymerization occurs in precise time and space, at high speeds, reaching more than 1 m / s (Andersson et al. 2014).

There is some evidence of dependence on N- and C-terminal domains for polymerization, which can lead to interesting technological possibilities. The adaptation of these domains flanking a protein of interest opens the possibility of its immobilization if spun alongside “native” spider silk proteins. Moreover, core structural domains’ ("poly(A/GA" and "GPGGx" and "GGX") customization influence the physical properties of the silk (Tokareva et al. 2014). Fig. 2 represents a scheme of the spider silk proteins and the chimeric protein proposed in this project.

Heterologous proteins are produced in several established expression systems, such as Escherichia coli, mammalian cell lines and yeast, but several systems are in the developing pipeline. Appropriate expression system choice should be based on priorities regarding performance and requirements of each recombinant protein (Walsh 2014). Currently, mammalian "CHO" cells (Chinese Hamster Ovary) and E. coli are the most used systems, which correspond to 35.5% and 19%, respectively, of the total products approved by the FDA in biopharmaceuticals (Walsh 2014). E. coli cells have rapid growth, productivity and low production cost, but it is a system unable to produce complex proteins and some post-translational modifications. Moreover, the production of endotoxins and inclusion bodies requires more purification process steps (Petsch 2000).

Therapeutic proteins are preferably produced in transgenic mammalian cell systems, because of their ability to express and correctly fold proteins. However, its production cost is high, especially when compared to plants as expression systems. Molecules such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are mainly produced in mammalian cells and their average production cost in this system is estimated to be $ 150.00 per gram of raw materials, whereas production in plant systems costs approximately US$0.05 per gram (Dove 2002, Mayfield et al. 2003). But the estimated value for algae reaches US $ 0.002 per liter, making them potential competitors for land plants (Mayfield et al. 2003). Microalgae present several desirable features in an expression system, such as: rapid growth (characteristic for microbial growth), swift and stable transgenic lineage generation, scalability and low-cost production (Wijffels et al. 2013, Rosenberg et al. 2008). They are also able to produce and secrete complex proteins and perform post-transcriptional modifications. They are Generally Regarded As Safe (GRAS), with low risk of virus contamination, prions or bacterial endotoxins, and establish no gene flow with the flora around through pollens as in transgenic plants (Mayfield et al. 2007).

However, the studies on genetic engineering using microalgae are incipient and present challenges. The main challenge is the low productivity of recombinant proteins expressed in the nuclear genome, hindering commercial applications to date (Rasala and Mayfield 2011). Strategies to increase nuclear expression levels in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii are being developed. These strategies may result in productivity gains, enabling commercial-scale production. Such strategies include codon optimization (León-Bañares et al. 2004), development of alternative vectors (Heitzer and Zschoernig 2007, Lauersen et al. 2013) and modifications to the design expressed constructs. Changes in constructs include the addition of autocleavage peptide (Rasala et al. 2012), use of fused promoters (Eichler-Stahlberg et al. 2009, Schroda et al. 2000) and addition of intronic sequences (Eichler-Stahlberg et al. 2009, Lumbreras et al. 1998). Alongside these improvements, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii presents a GC-rich genome, which may play an important role in spider silk protein expression due to its high GC content. It is hypothesized that high GC content clogs the heterologous expression of this kind of protein in non-GC-rich systems (Yang et al. 2016).

The vector pBluescript II (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) will be used. The constructed cassette will be flanked by the restriction sites Kpn l at one end, and Xba l at the other. There are also two different restriction sites, Xho l and Bam HI, flanking the coding sequence of the desired protein. The codons of the proteins will be optimized for the expression in C. reinhardtii nucleus (Fuhrmann et al. 1999) and the restriction sites Kpn l and Xba l will be removed. Rubisco introns will be inserted in the promoter hsp70A/rbcs2 sequence, in the Sh-ble sequence and in the terminal region RbcS2 3’ UTR, aiming to increase the expression of the protein of interest (Eichler-Stahlberg et al. 2009, Lumbreras et al. 1998). Primers will be designed to confirm (by PCR) the insertion of the whole sequence in the plasmidial vector. Fig. 3 shows the generic cassette for expression.

The native proteins MaSp1 and MaSp2 (Major Ampullate Silk Protein) were selected since they are the most studied proteins among the cob constituents. The antimicrobial enzymes were selected from a screening of the phiBIOTICS databank (Hojckova et al. 2013) looking for molecules that are effective against resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. All these proteins are summarized in Table 1.

The C. renhardtii strain cc1690 will be obtained at the Chlamydomonas Resource Center. After going through the process of transformation, the ones identified to produce the protein of interest will be grown for protein production. The strains will be cultivated in TAP (Tris-Acetate-Phosphate) medium (Gorman and Levine 1965) in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, containing 50 mL of the medium, at temperatures between 20-25ºC, under constant agitation at 100-150 rpm and constant illumination of 50 ± 10 μE/m 2 s. The growth will be evaluated by cell counting with Neubauer chambers and by reading the absorbance at 750 nm wavelength every 12 h (Eichler-Stahlberg et al. 2009). Aliquots will be taken during the growth process for further analysis and for identification of the proteins through Western Blot.

C. renhardtii cells will be grown in TAP medium until reaching the cell density of 3-6 x 106 cells/mL. The cells will be collected by centrifugation and resuspended in TAP enriched with 40 mM of sucrose reaching a cell density of 3-6 x 10 6 cells/mL. Then, 250 μL of the culture will be incubated with 300-1000 ng of plasmidial DNA, previously linearized through the digestion with Xba l and Kpn l for 5-10 min in cuvettes kept in an ice bath. An exponential electrical pulse of 2000 V/cm will be applied to the sample with an electroporation device, GenePulser XCellTM (BioRad, Hercules, CA). Capacitance will be adjusted to 25 mF and the resistance will not be regulated. After that, the cells will be incubated for 18 h in 10 mL of TAP/40 mM sucrose and plated in TAP/Zeocin solid medium (Rasala et al. 2012).

Recovered cells will be plated on TAP agar medium with increasing antibiotic concentrations (0.1, 2 and 5 μg/mL Zeocin). Candidate transformed colonies, displaying high Zeocin resistance, will be analyzed through PCR screening, and PCR positives colonies will be tested for protein of interest production by Western blot. Basically, the mutant cells are cultured as described above and fractions of the supernatant and cell lysate will be tested for the presence of the protein of interest. Cell lysis will be accomplished by sonication as described in the literature (Lumbreras et al. 1998).

Samples of supernatant and total soluble proteins will be denatured by adding SDS-PAGE loading buffer (Laemmli) with β-mercaptoethanol, followed by incubation at 95 °C for 5 min. Proteins will be separated on 12% polyacrylamide gels at 120-150 V and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane at 200mA for 1h. Then they will be blocked in 5% solution of skimmed milk and the protein of interest will be probed with monoclonal mouse anti-His antibody. The membrane will then be washed 3 times with TBS-T (Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 detergent) for 10 min and incubated with anti-mouse antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (BCIP) and nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) substrates which forms an insoluble dark blue diformazan precipitate, allowing protein identification.

Purification of the proteins of interest will be carried out by Nickel resin (Ni Superflow His60, Clontech®) following the manufacturer's instructions. The method is based on the affinity interaction with the hexa histidine tail, present in recombinant protein with the already mentioned resin. Basically, the sample is added to the column with the resin precharged with nickel ions, in which the proteins of interest containing histidine residues on its surface will be attached. Proteins not bound to the column will be washed out with the wash buffer, while the protein of interest is eluted with buffer containing 500 mM Imidazole.

Quantification of purified proteins will be obtained via the Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Thus 200 μL of sample are incubated in 96-well plates at 37 °C for 30 min, then the solutions are removed, blocked in 5% solution of skimmed milk and the wells are washed 3 times with TBS-T (Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 detergent) . Then, 200 μL/well of TBS-T solution of monoclonal mouse anti-His is added and incubated at room temperature for 2 h and washed as described above. A new TBS-T solution with anti-mouse monoclonal antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase is added, incubated at room temperature for 2 h and washed 3 times with TBS-T for 10 min. For the development, a freshly prepared solution of p-nitrophenyl phosphate is added and incubated in the wells for 30 min, and the plate is subsequently read in a plate reader at 405 nm.

Results will be evaluated by analysis of variation (ANOVA) performed in Statistica software 10. Statistical significance will be evaluated by estimating the descriptive level (p) and the results will be considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 (confidence level of 95%) .The methods described above are shown in the flowchart in Fig. 4 and the execution chronogram in Table 2.