Related articles by  
Workshop Report
Research Ideas and Outcomes 8: e85859
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.8.e85859 (04 May 2022)
Reviewable
v1
Other versions:

(Verbatim name)

ID

(Catalog Number)

ORG

DES

Invalid DOI was provided, please try again

XML
PDF
 
 
Twitter
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CiteCite
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • TabsTabs
  • TaxaTaxa
  • DataData
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
  • NanopubsNanopubs
  • ReviewsReviews
  • Article metadata
  • Date and place
  • List of participants
  • Introduction
  • Aims of the workshop
  • Key outcomes and discussions
    • A high degree of variation in current cave monitoring practices
    • Conservation status of caves
    • Prospects for future cave monitoring  
      • (1) Cave monitoring should focus on bio- and geodiversity elements alike
      • (2) Local communities should be involved, and formal agreements envisaged
      • (3) Caves must be understood as windows into the subterranean realm
      • (4) Touristic caves should not be excluded ad-hoc from regular monitoring
      • (5) New digital tools and open FAIR data infrastructures should be implemented
      • (6) Cave biomonitoring should focus on a large(r) biological diversity
      • (7) DNA-based tools should be integrated
  • Conclusion 
  • References
  • Supplementary files
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories
Powered by