Research Idea
Research Ideas and Outcomes 1: e7642
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.1.e7642 (29 Dec 2015)
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.1.e7642 (29 Dec 2015)
- ContentsContents
- Article InfoArticle Info
- CitationCitation
- MetricsMetrics
- Reviews1Reviews
- RelatedRelated
- FigsFigs
- RefsRefs
- CitedCited
Maria Houtchens
Citation:
Houtchens M (2023) Review of: Mental synthesis involves the synchronization of independent neuronal ensembles. Research Ideas and Outcomes 1: e7642.
doi: 10.3897/rio.1.e7642.r20343
Review Form
Questions & Answers
Does the manuscript conform to the focus and scope of this journal? | Yes |
Does the manuscript contain unpublishable, for example fraudulent or pseudoscience, content? | No |
Do the title, abstract and keywords accurately reflect the contents and data? | Yes |
Is the manuscript written in grammatically and stylistically correct English? | Yes |
Does the manuscript contain sufficiently detailed information to merit publication? | Yes |
Are the methods relevant to the study and adequately described? | Yes |
Did the authors cite most of the literature pertinent to the subject? | Yes |
Are all relevant non-textual data and media (data sets, audio and video files, data from which graphs are produced) available as either supplementary files to the manuscript or through links to external repositories? | N/A |
In case data are deposited elsewhere, are they available openly, and do the links to these resolve correctly? | N/A |
Are the data consistent, properly recorded internally and described using applicable standards (e.g. in terms of file formats, file names, units and metadata)? | N/A |
Are the conclusions supported by the data? | Yes |
If applicable, are taxonomic and nomenclatural novelties compliant to the respective biological Code? | N/A |
Are the illustrations of sufficient quality? | Moderately |
Are conflicts of interest, relevant permissions and other ethical issues addressed in an appropriate manner? | N/A |
Notes
I am familiar with this author's work on mental synthesis. As a neurologist, I find his ideas very interesting. I look forward to the results of his experiments in the near future, and believe that his article merits a publication in your Journal.
Final Review Statement
I fully support the publication of this important concept on mental synthesis, and look forward to reviewing the results of the proposed experiments in the near future.
I've reviewed this manuscript and support its publication