Related articles by  
NSF Grant Proposal
Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e10610
https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10610 (30 Sep 2016)
Reviewable
v1
Other versions:

(Verbatim name)

ID

(Catalog Number)

ORG

DES

Invalid DOI was provided, please try again

XML
PDF
 
 
Twitter
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CiteCite
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • FigsFigs
  • TabsTabs
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
  • NanopubsNanopubs
  • ReviewsReviews
  • Article metadata
  • List of participants
  • Data management plan
    • Types of Data Produced
    • Data and Metadata Standards
    • Policies for Access and Sharing
    • Policies for Re-use and Distribution
    • Plans for Archiving and Preservation
    • Roles and Responsibilities
  • Project description
    • 1. Taxonomic names are (ambiguous) taxonomic concept lineage identifiers
    • 2. New syntax and semantics for identifying and articulating taxonomic concepts
    • 3. Design and trust – a taxonomic 'synthesis' that nobody believes in
    • 4. Intellectual merit: Creating a trusted "big" biodiversity data culture
    • 5. Why SERNEC? Review of relevant prior work
    • 6. Achieving scale with the Euler/X reasoning toolkit
    • 7. ABI Development objectives: Taxonomic concept resolution for SERNEC
    • 8. Research and implementation plan: Realizing objectives 1–5
    • 9. Lead personnel and management
    • 10. Broader impacts – scientific and educational
    • 11. Sustainability
  • Results from prior NSF support
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Subscribe to email alerts for current Article's categories
Powered by